Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cody Harris <hchs@ns.sympatico.ca>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Not forwarding?
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:51:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040329155147.4fa98da1@darna.vectec.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403282224.12071.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>

It didn't work. I'm getting somebody on my ISP to test it (offsite). The firewall IPs are: 10.30.7.147 for net (my ISP nats it) and 192.168.0.1 and my box i want to forward to is 192.168.0.2. It still doesn't work. Here's an updated ruleset:


Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 3787 packets, 1815K bytes)
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination
    0     0 DROP       tcp  --  eth0   any     anywhere             anywhere           tcp dpt:10000
    0     0 DROP       tcp  --  eth0   any     anywhere             anywhere           tcp dpt:631
    3   144 DROP       tcp  --  eth0   any     anywhere             anywhere           tcp dpt:http
    0     0 DROP       tcp  --  eth0   any     anywhere             anywhere           tcp dpt:smtp
    0     0 DROP       tcp  --  eth0   any     anywhere             anywhere           tcp dpt:ftp
    0     0 ACCEPT     icmp --  eth0   any     anywhere             anywhere           icmp echo-reply
    0     0 ACCEPT     icmp --  eth0   any     anywhere             anywhere           icmp destination-unreachable
    0     0 ACCEPT     icmp --  eth0   any     anywhere             anywhere           icmp redirect
    0     0 ACCEPT     icmp --  eth0   any     anywhere             anywhere           icmp echo-request
    0     0 ACCEPT     icmp --  eth0   any     anywhere             anywhere           icmp time-exceeded
    0     0 DROP       icmp --  eth0   any     anywhere             anywhere

Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 36 packets, 2291 bytes)
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination
    0     0 ACCEPT     all  --  any    any     anywhere             anywhere           state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
    0     0 ACCEPT     tcp  --  any    any     192.168.0.2          anywhere           tcp dpt:ssh

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 3996 packets, 585K bytes)
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination


On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:24:12 +0100,
Someone named Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> wrote:

> On Sunday 28 March 2004 10:07 pm, Cody Harris wrote:
> 
> > I rewrote the rules following your suggestions. It still doesn't work:
> >
> > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> > target     prot opt in     out     source              destination
> > ACCEPT     all  --  eth1   any     anywhere             anywhere
> 
> Okay, that will allow all packets coming through from eth1
> 
> > ACCEPT     tcp  --  any    any     anywhere             192.168.0.2       
> > tcp dpt:ssh state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> 
> That will allow packets coming through from 192.168.0.2 (which is plugged in 
> to eth1) to destination port 22.
> 
> You have no rule to allow the reply packets back (and the above rule won't 
> allow the NEW packets through, either).
> 
> Try this:
> 
> iptables -F FORWARD
> iptables -P FORWARD DROP
> iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A FORWARD -s 192.168.0.2 -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
> 
> If that doesn't work tell us exactly how you are testing it - which machine is 
> the SSH client on, where is the server, what are the IP addresses...
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Antony.
> 
> -- 
> It is also possible that putting the birds in a laboratory setting 
> inadvertently renders them relatively incompetent.
> 
>  - Daniel C Dennet
> 
>                                                      Please reply to the list;
>                                                            please don't CC me.
> 
> 


-- 
+------------------+-----------------------------+
| Cody Harris      | --------------------------- |
| ---------------- | --------------------------- |
+------------------+-------+---------------------+---+
| *Sigh*. No key.                                    |
+----------------------------------------------------+


  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-29 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-28 19:52 Not forwarding? Cody Harris
2004-03-28 20:43 ` David Cannings
2004-03-28 20:54   ` Antony Stone
2004-03-28 21:07     ` Cody Harris
2004-03-28 21:15       ` David Cannings
2004-03-29 19:53         ` Cody Harris
2004-03-28 21:24       ` Antony Stone
2004-03-29 19:51         ` Cody Harris [this message]
2004-03-29 20:26           ` Cody Harris
2004-03-29 21:42             ` Antony Stone
2004-03-29 22:56               ` Cody Harris
2004-03-30  7:48                 ` Antony Stone
2004-03-30 11:33                   ` Cody Harris
2004-03-30 11:53                     ` Antony Stone
2004-03-30 20:01                       ` Adding a flag to a packet Cody Harris
2004-03-30 20:24                         ` Antony Stone
2004-03-30 20:35                           ` Cody Harris
2004-03-30 20:50                             ` Antony Stone
2004-03-30 21:06                               ` Cody Harris
2004-03-30 21:23                                 ` Antony Stone
2004-03-30 21:28                                   ` Cody Harris
2004-03-30 21:40                                     ` Antony Stone
2004-03-30 22:19                                       ` Cody Harris
2004-03-31  8:19                                     ` Cedric Blancher
2004-03-31  8:22                               ` Cedric Blancher
2004-03-30 22:12                             ` Tony Earnshaw
2004-03-30 22:25                               ` Cody Harris
2004-03-30 23:46                               ` Antony Stone
2004-03-31  0:21                                 ` Tony Earnshaw
2004-03-28 20:48 ` Not forwarding? Antony Stone
2004-03-28 20:59   ` Cody Harris
2004-03-28 21:09     ` Antony Stone
2004-03-28 21:16       ` Cody Harris
2004-03-28 21:14     ` David Cannings
2004-03-28 21:15   ` Cody Harris
2004-03-28 21:32     ` Antony Stone
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-28 19:49 Cody Harris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040329155147.4fa98da1@darna.vectec.net \
    --to=hchs@ns.sympatico.ca \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox