From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sven Schuster Subject: Re: Reinjecting packets using libipq Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:26:45 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040420132645.GA23569@zion.homelinux.com> References: <20040420102929.GA6236@zion.homelinux.com> <009401c426d9$3e2a3a10$68892090@grouse> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <009401c426d9$3e2a3a10$68892090@grouse> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Jee J.Z." Cc: aksingh@hss.hns.com, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Howdy Jee, On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 02:13:16PM +0100, Jee J.Z. told us: > Hi, >=20 > You can have a look at 'libnet' for injecting a new packet. I think it's > good for packet construction. But I am not sure whether the newly generat= ed > packet can bypass a certain hook or not at this time. I think those packets would traverse the hooks as it is completely new injected into the networking stack. But it would probably be the same=20 with packet sockets (btw. maybe libnet uses packet socket and is just a comfortable way for building the packets) Sven >=20 > Jee >=20 --=20 Linux zion 2.6.6-rc1 #1 Sat Apr 17 11:50:12 CEST 2004 i686 athlon i386 GNU/= Linux 15:23:25 up 2 days, 22:21, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00 --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAhSUVo4FAdB2PneQRAgHPAJ935y7Ekq35Lc8XVoxrPRt0Nsb1hQCeOJBx qgVFxLe64KDOPKS+nATBHPA= =LNaV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--