From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Leslie Polzer Subject: OT: ISP Port filters (was: Re: DNAT problem) Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 09:56:53 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040530095653.2514f4f4.leslie.polzer@gmx.net> References: <20040529172536.6df75cca.leslie.polzer@gmx.net> <000701c44592$bb254460$0200000a@heretic> <20040529180330.6ec3d567.leslie.polzer@gmx.net> <001b01c445e1$711ab3b0$0200000a@heretic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <001b01c445e1$711ab3b0$0200000a@heretic> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Sat, 29 May 2004 22:00:03 -0300 "Alexis" wrote: > to filter some ports is becoming a new "fashion" by the ISP. > > The reason is "why he will serve a webserver if i can do this and charge some > fresh money for it" I'm really angry about this - blocking ports is one thing, but not telling the customer about this and thereby giving him enormous headaches when he tries to configure his network, another. Well, enough ranting now. Leslie