From: Jeff Gordon <jeff.gordon@wellnow.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Can I add a module to a prebuilt kernel?
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:06:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040602190641.GQ18797@wellnow.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40BE09B2.90501@web.de>
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 07:09:06PM +0200, Florian Boelstler wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Jeff Gordon wrote:
> > I'm running a RH ES 3 system, and it appears _support_ for ipt_recent
> > is included in the kernel but libipt_recent.so is nowhere to be found.
> > Kernel source for the prebuilt kernel in the distribution is available.
>
> In general, if a kernel feature is built into the kernel there is no
> appropriate module file. Because the functionality is in the kernel.
(Thanks, Florian. :-) Here's what I'm seeing:
- If I do 'modprobe ipt_recent' and then 'lsmod |grep ip',
I see 'ipt_recent' at the top of listing.
- However, if I then add a rule with '-m recent' in it,
iptables complains it can't find libipt_recent.so.
> > Is there a simple way to build ipt_recent from source and have it
> > function with this kernel, without compiling a kernel from scratch?
>
> I never tried it, but if you got an appropriate kernel config for your
> running kernel you could start by "make modules && make modules_install"
> (regarding 2.4.x series)
>
> This only works of course if
> - - you just miss the module file
> - - it is _not_ build into the kernel
> - - and your kernel is prepared to load that feature through a module
I guess I don't know. :-) The result of 'modprobe' seems to suggest
the kernel understands what I'm saying -- but iptables expects to find
a loadable file that isn't present. Should I be thinking to leave the
kernel as-is but compile iptables itself from scratch...? Details:
iptables v1.2.8
/lib/modules/2.4.21-15.ELsmp/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.o
...but no /lib/iptables/libipt_recent.so
> Good luck,
(Thanks. :-)
--
-- Jeff -- <http://www.wellnow.com>
"There's nothing left in the world to prove. All that's worth doing
is to love one another, using whatever means are available to serve."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-02 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-02 7:38 Can I add a module to a prebuilt kernel? Jeff Gordon
[not found] ` <40BE09B2.90501@web.de>
2004-06-02 19:06 ` Jeff Gordon [this message]
2004-06-03 7:52 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2004-06-03 21:01 ` Jeff Gordon
2004-06-04 7:48 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2004-06-03 21:16 ` Best defense for syn-floods...? Jeff Gordon
2004-06-02 21:04 ` Can I add a module to a prebuilt kernel? Martin Stricker
2004-06-02 22:13 ` Florian Boelstler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040602190641.GQ18797@wellnow.com \
--to=jeff.gordon@wellnow.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox