From: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
To: netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Samba "Leak"
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 23:03:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407072303.51085.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1089237164.30076.23.camel@localhost>
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 10:52 pm, David Cary Hart wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 15:35, Antony Stone wrote:
> >
> > Here are my comments / thoughts:
> >
> > 1. Just because you're seeing WAN addresses doesn't mean they aren't
> > spoofed (they could be packets from the LAN, but with external source
> > addresses?)
>
> ??
I can't think of a good reason why, but it seems quite possible to me that
some Trojan / malware on an internal machine might generate packets with
false source IPs?
I was just trying to think up an explanation for you seeing packets on your
LAN with public IPs which didn't come through your firewall...
> > 2. Do you have any wireless involved anywhere, as a means for unknown
> > clients to access the network?
>
> Yes. Security is through the MAC of the client card. It's hard coded for
> our two cards. Encryption is still a challenge for MadWifi. I assumed
> that only the MAC of the router is sent out with packets.
Most Access Points are operated as bridges; therefore the MAC addresses will
be the real MAC addresses of the communicating devices - you will never see
the MAC address of the AP on packets unless someone is communicating with it
directly (eg: SNMP?).
> > 3. A packet sniffer / IDS on the external firewall link + the Samba
> > subnet (DMZ?) should tell you what is really going on. Maybe a chance
> > to play with Snort :)
>
> That's the simplest solution. I never could quite get the hang of The
> Pig but I suppose that Ethereal should get it done.
Yup - ethereal listening on both an external and an internal interface should
do a perfectly good job.
Regards,
Antony.
--
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing left to add, but
rather when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Please reply to the list;
please don't CC me.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-07 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-07 19:23 Samba "Leak" David Cary Hart
2004-07-07 19:35 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-07 21:52 ` David Cary Hart
2004-07-07 22:03 ` Antony Stone [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200407072303.51085.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk \
--to=antony@soft-solutions.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox