From: Antony Stone <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Blocking programs with IPtables
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:12:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407301612.38554.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <267354A234DF4D46AA6AE56E1240BEF004A3C4@wcsls03.wcslnet.net>
On Friday 30 July 2004 4:04 pm, Steve Wakelin wrote:
> Easiest way is to setup your IMAP server on a different port other than 143
> and then configure Thunderbird to use that port. Disable access to 143.
Except that Leonardo obviously doesn't trust his users not to surreptitiously
continue using Outlook when they've been told to use Thunderbird - so he
doesn't trust them not to configure Outlook to connect to the same port that
Thunderbird connects to.
Antony.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
> [mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org] On Behalf Of Antony Stone
> Sent: 30 July 2004 15:48
> To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: Re: Blocking programs with IPtables
>
> On Friday 30 July 2004 3:38 pm, Leonardo Teves wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I´m new in this forum, and i have a little question.
> > Is there a way to block some programs with Iptables?
> > I want to block Microsoft Outlook recovering mail from Imap server.
> > I want to force all users to use Thunderbird as mail client without
> > deinstalling Outlook from every workstation.
> > Is my question clear?
> > Any ideas?
>
> Your question is clear.
>
> This cannot be done with netfilter (because all imap connections look the
> same to netfilter, no matter what client or server software is being used)
>
> I cannot think of another way to do it either, because I would be surprised
> if Outlook sent anything in its connect message to identify itself as
> Outlook (the server end of a connection often does, but the client end
> usually doesn't, except for web browsers).
>
> Sorry - but perhaps someone else here can prove me wrong?
>
> Regards,
>
> Antony.
--
"Linux is going to be part of the future. It's going to be like Unix was."
- Peter Moore, Asia-Pacific general manager, Microsoft
Please reply to the list;
please don't CC me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-30 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-30 15:04 Blocking programs with IPtables Steve Wakelin
2004-07-30 15:12 ` Antony Stone [this message]
2004-07-30 15:18 ` Gavin Hamill
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-30 14:38 Leonardo Teves
2004-07-30 14:48 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-30 15:41 ` Leonardo Teves
2004-07-30 16:26 ` Eric Leblond
2004-08-01 16:29 ` Leonardo Teves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200407301612.38554.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk \
--to=antony@soft-solutions.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox