From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Opperisano Subject: Re: DNAT/NAPT Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:54:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20041123195407.GA2891@bender.817west.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 02:43:56PM -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > Hi, > > I think that it is possible to achieve some kind of load-balancing > between two servers using iptables NAPT (Network and port translation, > which is usually called port forwarding). > > I want to run 2 web servers and use my firewall to do some > load-balancing between them, but I was wondering if it only forwarded > the packets on some round-robin way, even if one host is down. To > summarize, I want to know if I can do some automatic failover with iptables. > > If you need more info, let me know why not do it for real? http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ -j -- "That's it! You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college!" --The Simpsons