From: ads nat <adsnat@yahoo.com>
To: Alexis <alexis@tpys.com.ar>, 'Steve Comfort' <steve@4Dllc.com>,
netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: Is this at all possible
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:52:32 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041202145232.19949.qmail@web60401.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
I am facing similar problem.
I have two Gateways getting Internet bandwidth from
two different sources.
Server no. 1 will disctribute bandwidth by natting to
IP address 192.168.0.2-192.168.0.150 of subnet.
eth0 - xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
eth1 192.168.0.1
GATEWAY setting for subnet client's will be
192.168.0.1
Server No. 2 will supply bandwidth to same subnet but
it will be with squid proxy server authentication and
DHCL running. In DHCP configuration I will configure
IP's 192.168.0.151-192.168.0.200
eth0 - xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
eth1 - 192.168.0.254
GATEWAY setting for these IP client's will
192.168.0.254
I think It should be possible. I don't have
infrastructure to check this in the lab therefore
question.
Thanks for support.
--- Alexis <alexis@tpys.com.ar> wrote:
> Double nat is the solution for this issue.
>
>
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO//netfilter-double-nat-HOWTO.htm
> l
>
>
>
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
> > [mailto:netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org] En
> nombre de
> > Steve Comfort
> > Enviado el: Jueves, 02 de Diciembre de 2004 9:06
> > Para: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> > Asunto: Is this at all possible
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm 99% sure that the answer to this one is no,
> but a
> > customer asked :)
> >
> > They have two buildings with networks running on
> the same
> > (192.168.2.x) subnet.
> >
> > Is it possible to configure a (wireless) router
> that would be
> > capable of routing between these identical
> sub-nets. Somehow,
> > maybe restricting one half to addresses below 127
> and getting
> > cunning with the netmask?
> >
> > Don't ask why they don't want to change to
> different subnets!
> >
> > A resounding lack of response will be sufficient
> confirmation
> > for me that this is a silly scenario.
> >
> > Ciao
> > Steve Comfort
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
next reply other threads:[~2004-12-02 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-02 14:52 ads nat [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-02 18:11 Is this at all possible Daniel Chemko
2004-12-02 12:05 Steve Comfort
2004-12-02 13:06 ` Alexis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041202145232.19949.qmail@web60401.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=adsnat@yahoo.com \
--cc=alexis@tpys.com.ar \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=steve@4Dllc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox