From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Opperisano Subject: Re: Packets that should have been DNATted appearing in INPUT table Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:55:57 -0500 Message-ID: <20050106155557.GA28339@bender.817west.com> References: <000901c4f350$7b3d1370$4206a8c0@loki> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000901c4f350$7b3d1370$4206a8c0@loki> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Cc: Marius Mertens On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 07:00:40PM +0100, Marius Mertens wrote: > first of all, please cc me in your answer as I am not a subscriber of this > list. always a great way to start a post... does your DNAT work or not? -j -- "What's the point of going out, we're just going to end up back here anyway?" --The Simpsons