From: Jason Opperisano <opie@817west.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic Nat rules
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:59:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050121155944.GA21392@bender.817west.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4384574050119064978cdb9d0@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 08:49:10AM -0600, Bracey Summers wrote:
> I am new to iptables and need some guidance. I have done a good bit
> of reading over the past few days and have learned much. With this
> knowledge I have come up with a solution for my task, but am not
> convinced that it is the most efficient approach. I was hoping that I
> could get some guidance from someone who is more knowledgeable.
>
> My Setup:
> Red Hat ES3
> uname -r = 2.4.21-20.0.1.ELsmp
> iptables -V = iptables v1.2.8
> ip -V = ip utility, iproute2-ss010824
>
> Dual NIC server
> eth1 - To Router (internet)
> eth0 - Internal public space IP range
>
> The Task:
> Block all traffic from the internal interface except port 80/443.
> Forward 80/443 to my web server which will have a rewrite rule. The
> user will then be shown a web page for authentication. Once the user
> is validated they will be granted outbound access for a specified time
> period (on most ports).
>
> For my test setup I did not have public IP space to play with so I
> created a private network (192.168.0.0). I then created the following
> rule to get access to the external network.
>
> MASQUERADE
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j SNAT --to external_network
>
> This is the part that I am not to sure about.
>
> NAT - [One entry for each ip address]
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -s 192.168.0.2 -i eth0 --d 0/0
> --dport 80,443 -j DNAT --to my_web_server
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -s 192.168.0.3 -i eth0 --d 0/0
> --dport 80,443 -j DNAT --to my_web_server
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -s 192.168.0.4 -i eth0 --d 0/0
> --dport 80,443 -j DNAT --to my_web_server
> ...
>
> This rule should forward all internal web/ssl traffic to my web
> server. I tested a command that was a similar and it worked.
>
> Now the problem ???
>
> If I had 500 internal IP addresses I would have to create a NAT for
> each one of them. Once the user authenticated I would have to remove
> the NAT for that users IP for a specified time period. Then I would
> have to create a filter to allow outbound access to the ports that I
> wanted to allow for that IP. After their time has expired I would
> have to add the NAT back and delete the filter rule. This seems like
> it would work, but it is a lot of management. I tried to just make
> one NAT to forward any internal IP address on port 80/443 to my web
> server and that worked until the user authenticated. Once the user
> was authenticated I had no way of getting around the NAT rule for
> 80/443. If I understand what I have been reading correctly the NAT
> PREROUTING rule is evaluated first. Therefore there is not way for me
> to allow an ip address in my internal network range to bypass this
> rule.
>
> Any guidance is appreciated.
create a custom chain to hold the authenticated IP addresses which is
evaluated first in the nat PREROUTING chain, and have the DNAT rule as
the second rule; i.e.,
iptables -t nat -N authips
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m mport --dports 80,443 \
-j authips
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m mport --dports 80,443 \
-j DNAT --to my_web_server
now--add and remove your rules in the authips chain. i will not argue
that this is efficient, but it works just fine for relatively small
numbers of IPs (<512 IMHO).
--
"Mmmm...free goo."
--The Simpsons
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-21 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-19 14:49 Dynamic Nat rules Bracey Summers
2005-01-21 15:16 ` Jorge Dávila
2005-01-21 15:59 ` Jason Opperisano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050121155944.GA21392@bender.817west.com \
--to=opie@817west.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox