From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Opperisano Subject: Re: VPN through the firewall Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:29:49 -0500 Message-ID: <20050303222949.GA6531@bender.817west.com> References: <42263F2C.9030600@jump-technologies.com> <1109805779.4455.1.camel@hubcap.ljm.dom> <422787FC.6020308@jump-technologies.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <422787FC.6020308@jump-technologies.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 03:56:12PM -0600, Marty Phee wrote: > Yes, PPTP I believe. mmm hmmm... > Jason Opperisano wrote: > >On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 17:33, Marty Phee wrote: > > > >>I've got a SUSE box running my home firewall and a WinXP work machine > >>that I use to VPN into the office network. Before I put this SUSE 9.2 suse 9.2 == 2.6 kernel-based > >>in I had a Mandrake 9.1 box that worked just fine. mandrake 9.1 == 2.4 kernel-based mandrake also had a tendency to ship the pptp/gre conntrack/nat kernel modules as part of their kernels... Gary W. Smith can speak to this much better than myself, but 2.6 + pptp/gre conntrack/nat is not a winning combo, AFAIK... -j -- "Alright brain, you don't like me and I don't like you. But let's just get through this and then I can get back to killing you with beer." --The Simpsons