From: Mariusz Kruk <Kruk@epsilon.eu.org>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: GRE over two NATs
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:04:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050404190444.GA22407@epsilon.rdc.pl> (raw)
I have a router with 4 interfaces on which I prepared a "IMQ without IMQ
setup". Long story short - every packet that traverses the router is
first pushed through a tunnel set up between 127.0.0.2 and 127.0.0.3.
Therefore I can easily shape the trafic for all interfaces.
It looks like this (one interface only for simplicity):
localnet --- eth3 --- localend <---------> remoteend --- eth0 --- world
Where localnet is of course my local network, eth3 is a local interface,
localend is a "local" end of the tunnel, and so on.
I use NAT and therefore I have to NAT every packet twice, since... I
don't exactly remember what was the exact reason but it had something to
do with connection tracking. Anyway, my 192.168.0.0/16 local addresses
are first mapped 1-to-1 to 172.16.0.0/16 addresses and finally all are
mapped to my public IP.
Everything runs well except GRE.
My users complained that they can't connect to their VPNs over PPTP.
PPTP uses GRE, so I started to log packets in various tables.
I found that for a GRE packet generated in localnet it goes like this:
eth3, mangle/prerouting, mangle/forward, filter/forward, mangle/postrouting,
nat/postrouting, localend.
Then the packet gets in the box again from the remoteend end of the
tunnel and, surprisingly to me, gets logged at mangle/prerouting and
nat/prerouting(!).
Why is it so?
I won't be attaching my setup here since it is generated from a script
and has quite a few hundred rules (yes, I know it's not veryeffective,
but I wanted to have a vanilla kernel, and it's kind of a
proof-of-concept), but there is no rule that should filter such packets.
There is no rule in nat/prerouting table that applies to those packets.
I have completely no idea. :-(
--
\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\ Sorry, but I'm not programmed to handle this
.\.Kruk@epsilon.eu.org.\.\. case; I'll just pretend that you didn't ask
\.http://epsilon.eu.org/\.\ for it.(TeX)
.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.
next reply other threads:[~2005-04-04 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-04 19:04 Mariusz Kruk [this message]
2005-04-04 23:36 ` GRE over two NATs Daniel Lopes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050404190444.GA22407@epsilon.rdc.pl \
--to=kruk@epsilon.eu.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox