From: Adrian Turcu <adrian.turcu@gmvinteractive.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: I need help with "CONNMARK --set-mark"
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:34:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200504111134.26674.adrian.turcu@gmvinteractive.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4766 bytes --]
Hello list,
I experience some intermittent problems with CONNMARK chain when try to
conserve the connection mark. Sometimes it works just fine, but sometimes it
seems that it stops working for whatever reason. Let me explain my setup
(it's a test environment):
outside world | ---- | eth1 Linux_box eth0 | ---- | server
The traffic to the server has to be marked in order to shape it with tc
(iproute2). Well, I envisage that the rules in iptables will be growing fast
for the production environment, so I took advise from someone (Wang Jiang) on
LARTC who suggested to use CONNMARK to skip processing the long rules-list
for each packet enters/output my Linux box (which is really cool stuff). The
discussion was there on a different subject, but the problems I have are
related (I believe) with CONNMARK behaviour.
So, I have the rules as follows:
# match 'n' skip already marked traffic
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 0x8000/0x8000 \
-j CONNMARK --restore-mark --mask 0xffff
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 0x8000/0x8000 \
-j RETURN
#
# Assign different marks to different traffic:
# 192.168.1.218/32 is my server IP address and
# the traffic refers to Ingress (Egress will be similar)
# create a class :3280x
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -N class_3280x
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 \
-d ! 192.168.1.218/255.255.255.255 -j class_3280x
# mark the traffic matchin this class and return
# class :32801 (section 1)
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A class_3280x -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0x8021/0xFFFF
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A class_3280x -j RETURN
# create a class: 6550x
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -N class_6550x
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 \
-d 192.168.1.218/255.255.255.255 -j class_6550x
# mark the traffic matching this class and return
# class 65501 (section 2)
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A class_6550x -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0xFFDD/0xFFFF
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A class_6550x -j RETURN
# iprtoute2 tc stuff to regulate the traffic
#
# Ingress
/sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle ffff: ingress
# class :32801 (0x8021)
/sbin/tc filter add dev eth1 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 \
u32 match mark 0x8021 0xffff \
police rate 512kbit burst 512kbit mtu 1500 drop flowid :1
# class :65501 (0xFFDD)
/sbin/tc filter add dev eth1 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 \
u32 match mark 0xFFDD 0xffff \
police rate 256kbit burst 256kbit mtu 1500 drop flowid :1
Well, I generate some traffic on the network of eth1 to match the above rules.
I can see first packets (SYN if the rules are applied before the connections
establishes) matching the iptables rules for each class and then the flow is
matched by the first 2 rules only (which is what I intended to do - skip the
rules if traffic already marked). Now, I can also see the marked connections
using
cat /proc/net/ip_conntrack
which is fine.
When this setup works the traffic matches the tc rules, no probs, and it is
assigned the bandwidth I want. When it doesn't work... the traffic matches
the iptables rules in the same way when it's working, I can still track the
connections marks in /proc/net/ip_conntrack, but the tc rules are never
applied (I can see the stats for tc intercepting the traffic but not matching
the marks, it's like they are not there).
Some will say that this is related with iproute2 tools, but I have came across
with this situation: instead of CONNTRACK marking, I do normal MARK and save
the marks with CONNTRACK (just before RETURN), which means that in sections 1
& 2 identified above (for iptables rules) I rewrite the rules like this:
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A class_3280x -j MARK --set-mark 0x8021
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A class_3280x -j CONNMARK --save-mark
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A class_3280x -j RETURN
respectively,
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A class_6550x -j MARK --set-mark 0xFFDD
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A class_3280x -j CONNMARK --save-mark
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A class_6550x -j RETURN
This works always for me, I have try it dozens of time with no problem, whilst
the --set-mark in CONNTRACK works sometime 1 out of 10 tries or never. It
looks that setting the mark per connection is not that accurate and I need to
remark every packet if unmarked? Am I doing something wrong?
I'm using custom built kernel 2.6.11.6 and iptables 1.3.1. This rather strange
behaviour occurs (for at least I could tell) when restarting the linux box
and reaplying the rules or just deleting the rules and reaplying them again
or inserting new matching rules.
Any help will be much appreciated,
Adrian
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2005-04-11 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-11 10:34 Adrian Turcu [this message]
2005-04-14 12:32 ` I need help with "CONNMARK --set-mark" Adrian Turcu
2005-04-14 12:45 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-04-14 13:09 ` Filip Sneppe
2005-04-14 13:25 ` Adrian Turcu
2005-04-14 13:10 ` Adrian Turcu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200504111134.26674.adrian.turcu@gmvinteractive.com \
--to=adrian.turcu@gmvinteractive.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox