From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Opperisano Subject: Re: SNAT and IPSEC Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:01:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20050414170117.GA1994@bender.817west.com> References: <1113329293.29536.13.camel@fly.in.iantel.com.uy> <425C1D5F.7000302@lopsch.com> <1113393681.4244.3.camel@fly.in.iantel.com.uy> <425E783F.5070502@lopsch.com> <1113491959.6180.17.camel@fly.in.iantel.com.uy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1113491959.6180.17.camel@fly.in.iantel.com.uy> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 12:19:18PM -0300, Eduardo Spremolla wrote: > Are these patches incorporated in some iptables version so far? > > I'm running 1.2.9-2.3.1 now. and do not have development environment in > that box, as a secure measure. > > Thanks to every body who replayed so far. the patches in question: ipsec-01-output-hooks ipsec-02-input-hooks ipsec-03-policy-lookup ipsec-04-policy-checks are kernel patches, not iptables userspace patches. -j -- "Carter Pewterschmidt: Oh my god. He's violating Sea Breeze. Peter: No, he's just awkwardly positioning himself... OK, NOW he's violating Sea Breeze." --Family Guy