Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: /dev/rob0 <rob0@gmx.co.uk>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Enable Loopback confuse
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:18:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508190818.26391.rob0@gmx.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY22-F13F52A0BB552F1A3EF3365A6B50@phx.gbl>

On Friday 2005-August-19 05:41, nattapon viroonsri wrote:
> When i enable loopback i just use 2 line below and everything work
> fine iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT

Correct, unless earlier rules do something to prevent these rules from 
being evaluated.

> But i see many example around then have also included this line
>  below to enable loopback
> iptables -A FORWARD -o lo - j ACCEPT ?

They are wrong. FORWARD rules are checked when *both* the source and 
destination IP's are not local. Normal loopback traffic can never hit 
the FORWARD chain.

> So can i omit this line ?
> or what kind of packet that match this rule ?

Yes. None. It's possibly true that specially-crafted packets and silly 
routing could be employed, but this is not a real-world situation.

filter table            IP address
built-in chains         source          destination
----------------        ------          -----------
INPUT                   n/a             local
OUTPUT                  local           not local
FORWARD                 not local       not local

Each packet is checked against the rules in only one of the built-in 
chains, *except* loopback traffic, which hits OUTPUT going out, and 
then INPUT coming in.
-- 
    mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0"
    or "not-spam" is in Subject: header


  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-19 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-19 10:41 Enable Loopback confuse nattapon viroonsri
2005-08-19 13:18 ` /dev/rob0 [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-19 11:55 Joris Dobbelsteen
2005-08-20  8:30 Joris Dobbelsteen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200508190818.26391.rob0@gmx.co.uk \
    --to=rob0@gmx.co.uk \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox