From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: netfilter@rigacci.org Subject: Re: ip_conntrack_ftp as a module or built-in? Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:33:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20051122113351.GA29137@rigacci.org> References: <20051122104702.GC27443@rigacci.org> <54076.193.173.147.3.1132658395.squirrel@webmail.sterenborg.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54076.193.173.147.3.1132658395.squirrel@webmail.sterenborg.info> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Cc: Rob Sterenborg > I'm not sure if passing that parameter to the kernel during boot time > will work (probably not). > Why would you do that anyway : why not use the module ? We are developing a network appliance and we are trying to keep a small static kernel, with only the required features, no KMOD, no discover, hotplug or whatever. Infact this is a more generic question: a module that accepts some paramters can be built into the kernel and still receive all of them? Thanks -- Niccolo Rigacci Firenze - Italy