From: Jakub Wartak <vnulllists@pcnet.com.pl>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: system time going up with many rules updates
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:00:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601261100.18485.vnulllists@pcnet.com.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1138265165.10432.163.camel@sehe-c4.berlin.teles.de>
Dnia czwartek, 26 stycznia 2006 09:46, Sebastian Heidl napisa³:
> Hello List,
>
> I have some moderately busy (in terms of traffic) firewalls that are
> spending quite a lot CPU time in %system (> 70%) when there are a lot of
> updates to the netfilter rules.
> My question is: How can I lower the system time to enable the machines
> to handle more traffic ? Specifically, would nf-hipac or other netfilter
> projects help here ?
>
> These are 2.8GHz Xeon Machines with 512 MB RAM and GbE interfaces.
> During the "high-system-time period" they are forwarding about 30 Mbit/s
> traffic.
>
> The netfilter chains structure is as follows (only FORWARD is relevant):
>
> Chain FORWARD (policy DROP)
> *** publicly available services ***
> *** jump to chain with authenticated users ***
> *** services for authenticated users ***
>
> The last rule in the auth-chain is a REJECT so only authenticated users
> can access the private services. When a user logs in successfully a rule
> is added to the auth-chain, when he logs out the rule is deleted.
>
> At the mentioned high-system-time periods there are about 10 updates
> (add/delete) to the auth-chain per second.
>
> I'm thankful for any advice.
> _sh_
You could try ipsets, in my production systems they are rock solid stable.
Uptimes over 60 days are no problem ( except for power outages ). You don't
have to modify iptables rules just ipsets which far more effective. I'm
pushing over 1200 clients on P4 3GHz ( about 25-30 mbps , 50% cpu load, but
this machine also is running netflow probe... network cards: pure e100, every
client gets HFSC queue with SFQ qdisc, IMQ is also helping a little bit to
get VOIP prio. over P2P - to detect p2p i use ipp2p ). I heard even that
someone is pushing much more than that on dual Opterons ( 2 x 242 i suppose )
--
Jakub Wartak
-vnull
FreeBSD/OpenBSD/Linux/Solaris/Network Administrator
http://vnull.pcnet.com.pl/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-26 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-26 8:46 system time going up with many rules updates Sebastian Heidl
2006-01-26 10:00 ` Jakub Wartak [this message]
2006-01-26 11:33 ` Sebastian Heidl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200601261100.18485.vnulllists@pcnet.com.pl \
--to=vnulllists@pcnet.com.pl \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox