From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: Maurice Volaski <mvolaski@aecom.yu.edu>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: CONFIG_KMOD in x86_64/defconfig (was Re: iptables is complaining with bogus unknown error 18446744073709551615)
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:24:30 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060427192430.GE21823@rama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a06230904c07687df0a33@[129.98.90.227]>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1393 bytes --]
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:41:40AM -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:12:38PM -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> Automatic kernel module loading! That is an option and it's off by
> >> default. When it's off, attempts to load kernel modules are ignored
> >> internally, and that's why iptables was failing. It tried to load
> >> xt_tcpudp, but was ignored by the kernel.
> >What do you mean by "it's an option" and "is off by default". I would
> >claim that any major linux distribution that I've seen in the last ten
> >years has support for module auto loading (enabled by default).
>
> Distribution vendors are free to change it to whatever they want, I guess, but it's OFF by
> default in the official kernel (.config).
apparently architecture-specific:
grep KMOD arch/i386/defconfig
CONFIG_KMOD=y
grep KMOD arch/x86_64/defconfig
CONFIG_KMOD is not set
don't know why x86_64 turns it off by default. the help message says
'if unsure, say Y' (which makes sense!)
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-27 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200604210738.k3L7cBGO010103@mailgw.aecom.yu.edu>
2006-04-27 1:12 ` iptables is complaining with bogus unknown error 18446744073709551615 Maurice Volaski
2006-04-27 13:51 ` Harald Welte
2006-04-27 15:41 ` Maurice Volaski
2006-04-27 19:24 ` Harald Welte [this message]
2006-04-27 20:00 ` CONFIG_KMOD in x86_64/defconfig (was Re: iptables is complaining with bogus unknown error 18446744073709551615) Maurice Volaski
2006-04-27 20:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060427192430.GE21823@rama \
--to=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mvolaski@aecom.yu.edu \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox