Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: Maurice Volaski <mvolaski@aecom.yu.edu>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: CONFIG_KMOD in x86_64/defconfig (was Re: iptables is complaining with bogus unknown error 18446744073709551615)
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:24:30 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060427192430.GE21823@rama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a06230904c07687df0a33@[129.98.90.227]>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1393 bytes --]

On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:41:40AM -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:12:38PM -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> Automatic kernel module loading! That is an option and it's off by
> >> default. When it's off, attempts to load kernel modules are ignored
> >> internally, and that's why iptables was failing. It tried to load
> >> xt_tcpudp, but was ignored by the kernel.
> >What do you mean by "it's an option" and "is off by default".  I would
> >claim that any major linux distribution that I've seen in the last ten
> >years has support for module auto loading (enabled by default).
> 
> Distribution vendors are free to change it to whatever they want, I guess, but it's OFF by 
> default in the official kernel (.config).

apparently architecture-specific:

grep KMOD arch/i386/defconfig
CONFIG_KMOD=y

grep KMOD arch/x86_64/defconfig
CONFIG_KMOD is not set

don't know why x86_64 turns it off by default.  the help message says
'if unsure, say Y' (which makes sense!)
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>                 http://netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-27 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200604210738.k3L7cBGO010103@mailgw.aecom.yu.edu>
2006-04-27  1:12 ` iptables is complaining with bogus unknown error 18446744073709551615 Maurice Volaski
2006-04-27 13:51   ` Harald Welte
2006-04-27 15:41     ` Maurice Volaski
2006-04-27 19:24       ` Harald Welte [this message]
2006-04-27 20:00         ` CONFIG_KMOD in x86_64/defconfig (was Re: iptables is complaining with bogus unknown error 18446744073709551615) Maurice Volaski
2006-04-27 20:01         ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060427192430.GE21823@rama \
    --to=laforge@netfilter.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mvolaski@aecom.yu.edu \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox