Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Jacob <jacob@internet24.de>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: even hash tables sizes, FAQ entry
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:41:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070720074134.GB17809@internet24.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0707191712150.23721@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 479 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 05:13:11PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
[..]
> >Is this still true? What is the reason for this? And: Does
> >any odd hashtable size work as well as other odd hash tables sizes
> >in the same order of magnitude?
> 
> changing conntrack_max is not chaning the hash bucket count, that change 
> can only be done in the code or as a module parameter at module load time.

Sure, I meant odd hash bucket counts of course, so is this
FAQ still accurate?

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-20  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-19 22:17 need advice for high traffic network Konstantin Svist
2007-07-19 22:17 ` David Lang
2007-07-19 22:40   ` Konstantin Svist
2007-07-19 22:59     ` Thomas Jacob
2007-07-19 23:17       ` Konstantin Svist
2007-07-19 23:28         ` Thomas Jacob
2007-07-19 23:35           ` Konstantin Svist
2007-07-19 23:44             ` Thomas Jacob
2007-07-20  0:18               ` Konstantin Svist
2007-07-20  7:48                 ` Thomas Jacob
2007-07-20 17:51                   ` David Lang
2007-07-20 23:14                     ` Thomas Jacob
2007-07-19 23:47             ` even hash tables sizes, FAQ entry Thomas Jacob
2007-07-20  0:13               ` David Lang
2007-07-20  7:41                 ` Thomas Jacob [this message]
2007-07-20 17:44                   ` David Lang
2007-07-20 17:50                     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-20 18:08                       ` David Lang
2007-07-21  3:44                         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-08-06 18:50             ` need advice for high traffic network R. DuFresne
2007-07-19 22:49 ` Thomas Jacob
2007-07-19 22:53   ` Konstantin Svist
2007-07-19 23:16     ` David Lang
2007-07-20 14:16 ` Gregory Carter
     [not found] <200707202319.l6KNJMwx014487@mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk>
2007-07-21  6:41 ` even hash tables sizes, FAQ entry G.W. Haywood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070720074134.GB17809@internet24.de \
    --to=jacob@internet24.de \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox