Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Volker Sauer <volker@volker-sauer.de>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Problem with new --physdev-out style
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:18:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024071854.GA18581@volker-sauer.de> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2931 bytes --]

Hi,

with recent kernels, I have this problem:

kernel: physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and
POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore.

What does "non-bridged" in this context mean?? If it means rules (or
traffic) that goes over the INPUT our OUTPUT chain, I do not understand,
why my rule set causes this message to appers a thousand times.

Here's all my rules with --physdev-out:

arthur: ~ # grep physdev-out /etc/init.d/firewall
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_INT -i $IF_EXT -d $localnet -s $Any -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_INT --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -s $ZAPHOD -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_INT --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -s $localnet -p tcp -d $MARVIN --dport 3389 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_DMZ --physdev-out $IF_INT -d $ZAPHOD -p tcp --dport 135:139 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_DMZ --physdev-out $IF_INT -d $ZAPHOD -p udp --dport 135:139 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_DMZ --physdev-out $IF_INT -d $ZAPHOD -p tcp --dport 445 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_DMZ --physdev-out $IF_INT -d $ZAPHOD -p udp --dport 445 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_INT --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -s $ZAPHOD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_INT -i $BR_GUEST -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_GUEST -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -p tcp --dport 3389 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_GUEST -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_INT -p tcp --dport ssh -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_GUEST -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_INT -p tcp --dport 30022 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $IF_EXT -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -p tcp --sport 22 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $IF_EXT -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -s $i -p udp --sport 53 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT


Where: 

BR_INT="br-intern"
BR_GUEST="br-guest"
IF_EXT="eth0"
IF_INT="eth1"
IF_DMZ="vlan3"

You see, I use --physdev-out only in the FORWARD with bridged traffic, 
because the Interfaces given with -i or -i in these rules are always 
bridges (br-intern or br-guest).

Why do I get thousands of these error messages?

-- 
  Volker Sauer  *  Poststrasse 1/601   *   64293 Darmstadt  *   Germany
  E-Mail/Jabber: volker(at)volker-sauer.de * http://www.volker-sauer.de
  PGPKey-Fingerprint: DB26 11C7 B12E 0B27 3999 2E4F 7E35 4E4D 5DD5 D0E0
  http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7E354E4D5DD5D0E0 

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2007-10-24  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-24  7:18 Volker Sauer [this message]
2007-10-24  7:38 ` Problem with new --physdev-out style Patrick McHardy
2007-10-24  8:22   ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24  8:34     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-24  8:43       ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-10-24  9:15         ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24  9:22           ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-10-24  9:39             ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24  9:46               ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-10-24  9:05       ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24  9:42         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-24 12:06           ` Volker Sauer
2007-10-24 12:49             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-24 12:57               ` Volker Sauer
2007-10-24 14:11             ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-10-24 15:18               ` Volker Sauer
2007-10-24  9:28     ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24  8:36 ` Pascal Hambourg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071024071854.GA18581@volker-sauer.de \
    --to=volker@volker-sauer.de \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox