From: Volker Sauer <volker@volker-sauer.de>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Problem with new --physdev-out style
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:18:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024071854.GA18581@volker-sauer.de> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2931 bytes --]
Hi,
with recent kernels, I have this problem:
kernel: physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and
POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore.
What does "non-bridged" in this context mean?? If it means rules (or
traffic) that goes over the INPUT our OUTPUT chain, I do not understand,
why my rule set causes this message to appers a thousand times.
Here's all my rules with --physdev-out:
arthur: ~ # grep physdev-out /etc/init.d/firewall
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_INT -i $IF_EXT -d $localnet -s $Any -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_INT --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -s $ZAPHOD -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_INT --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -s $localnet -p tcp -d $MARVIN --dport 3389 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_DMZ --physdev-out $IF_INT -d $ZAPHOD -p tcp --dport 135:139 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_DMZ --physdev-out $IF_INT -d $ZAPHOD -p udp --dport 135:139 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_DMZ --physdev-out $IF_INT -d $ZAPHOD -p tcp --dport 445 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_DMZ --physdev-out $IF_INT -d $ZAPHOD -p udp --dport 445 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_INT --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -s $ZAPHOD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_INT -i $BR_GUEST -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_GUEST -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -p tcp --dport 3389 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_GUEST -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_INT -p tcp --dport ssh -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_GUEST -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_INT -p tcp --dport 30022 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $IF_EXT -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -p tcp --sport 22 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $IF_EXT -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -s $i -p udp --sport 53 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
Where:
BR_INT="br-intern"
BR_GUEST="br-guest"
IF_EXT="eth0"
IF_INT="eth1"
IF_DMZ="vlan3"
You see, I use --physdev-out only in the FORWARD with bridged traffic,
because the Interfaces given with -i or -i in these rules are always
bridges (br-intern or br-guest).
Why do I get thousands of these error messages?
--
Volker Sauer * Poststrasse 1/601 * 64293 Darmstadt * Germany
E-Mail/Jabber: volker(at)volker-sauer.de * http://www.volker-sauer.de
PGPKey-Fingerprint: DB26 11C7 B12E 0B27 3999 2E4F 7E35 4E4D 5DD5 D0E0
http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7E354E4D5DD5D0E0
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2007-10-24 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-24 7:18 Volker Sauer [this message]
2007-10-24 7:38 ` Problem with new --physdev-out style Patrick McHardy
2007-10-24 8:22 ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24 8:34 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-24 8:43 ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-10-24 9:15 ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24 9:22 ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-10-24 9:39 ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24 9:46 ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-10-24 9:05 ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24 9:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-24 12:06 ` Volker Sauer
2007-10-24 12:49 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-24 12:57 ` Volker Sauer
2007-10-24 14:11 ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-10-24 15:18 ` Volker Sauer
2007-10-24 9:28 ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24 8:36 ` Pascal Hambourg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071024071854.GA18581@volker-sauer.de \
--to=volker@volker-sauer.de \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox