From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Schlich Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] libnetfilter_conntrack 0.0.98 release Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:46:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20081130094646.GE9523@bla.fasel.org> References: <49313A4F.6090904@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=bla.fasel.org; h=date:from :to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to; s=mx; bh=uBtwOXKGbho4CcuXDmh//hID0aY=; b=gp2lLMwUsR f8r4+hNJKiX7vCXFfw+29PoXQUqqILOYMYyVekUVX3doRsOcdyJyErjpNQy9Pmoe PrfDAF334sRt7+kvjvc2N3d/wg7v1JfPqutFsyYNms4N9AhllCGqHDPwCZlYk6DG eH/jWcS17gJxm2se7CdF6XSXnNYvvzC4M= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49313A4F.6090904@netfilter.org> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org * Pablo Neira Ayuso [2008-11-29 13:49]: > Hi! Hey :) > The netfilter project proudly presents libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.98. After upgrading to 0.0.98 and restarting conntrackd, I constantly get such messages on the backup firewall, even after restarting conntrackd on both firewalls once again: 2008-11-30 10:40:08 +01:00; hafw2; daemon.warning; conntrack-tools[29154]: Received seq=1228038103 before expected seq=1228039271 2008-11-30 10:40:09 +01:00; hafw2; daemon.warning; conntrack-tools[29154]: Received seq=1228038104 before expected seq=1228039271 2008-11-30 10:40:10 +01:00; hafw2; daemon.warning; conntrack-tools[29154]: Received seq=1228038105 before expected seq=1228039273 2008-11-30 10:40:11 +01:00; hafw2; daemon.warning; conntrack-tools[29154]: Received seq=1228038106 before expected seq=1228039274 The numbers look kinda confusing to me. What's wrong? :) -- Regards, Wolfram Schlich Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/