From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "G. Skillen" <g@imagination.eu.org>
Subject: Re: NAT and openvpn
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:51:41 +0000
Message-ID: <20090328145141.01644dcc.g@imagination.eu.org>
References: <20090327211404.aa4d4e6d.g@imagination.eu.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0903281102060.27458@mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0903281102060.27458@mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: "G.W. Haywood" <ged@rowlescourt.co.uk>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org


> Would it not make more sense to run the servers on the remote machine?
> The sytem you describe would be unnecessarily fragile.

i understand your concern; neither machines run anything critical though. i'm just tinkering for the sake of tinkering really (and to perhaps learn something new).

cheers,
g