Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Radek Kanovsky <rk@dat.cz>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iptables rules in comparable form
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 18:47:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100601164757.GC15745@q.uh.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C050ADE.60403@chello.at>

On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 03:27:58PM +0200, Mart Frauenlob wrote:

> > are small but frequent. But primarily both solutions reset couters if
> > used and it is not good for me now. So I ended with script that does
> > incremental updates.
> 
> iptables[-save/restore] have a -c switch to save/restore counters.

There is some ISP DB that produces XML config for router. XML config
is transformed to iptables-restore rules and stored in some /etc file.
There are also some hand writen rules in /etc files controlled by admins.
I take all these files and prepare one big file which can be feed to
iptables-restore. Obviously without counters. So I take snapshot
of current ruleset via "iptables-save -c" command. Now I have
two ruleset but I am not able to compare them because some writes
destination ports with service names some with port numbers.
Some versions of iptables-save produces "-j MARK 0x2f" some
"-j MARK --set-mark 0x2f". So "iptables-save -c" is useles for me
unless I have some normalization utility that transforms all rules
to some common comparable form. I have it and I am doing it right this
way. I am asking if someone doesn't do this already or if there is some
more clever solution.

Regards

Radek Kanovsky

      reply	other threads:[~2010-06-01 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-01  8:10 iptables rules in comparable form Radek Kanovsky
2010-06-01  8:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-01  9:18   ` Mart Frauenlob
2010-06-01 11:25     ` Radek Kanovsky
2010-06-01 11:56       ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-01 16:03         ` Radek Kanovsky
2010-06-01 18:19           ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-01 18:35             ` Radek Kanovsky
2010-06-01 18:01         ` Radek Kanovsky
2010-06-01 18:26           ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-01 19:36             ` Radek Kanovsky
2010-06-01 20:29               ` Pieter Smit
2010-06-02  6:17                 ` Radek Kanovsky
2010-06-01 13:27       ` Mart Frauenlob
2010-06-01 16:47         ` Radek Kanovsky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100601164757.GC15745@q.uh.cz \
    --to=rk@dat.cz \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox