From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Kierdelewicz Subject: Re: Awkward scenario: 3 interfaces and 3 devices with same ip/subnet. Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 19:19:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20100902191911.3d2468d8@catus> References: <4C7D11F5.1010105@riverviewtech.net> <4C7D1F05.4050704@riverviewtech.net> <20100901091426.216b1778@catus> <20100902175625.2126d7d3@catus> <20100902183430.03fb9ceb@catus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Giacomo Bernardi Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org Hi, >I may be wrong, but isn't arp per-interface? >root@host ~# arp -i eth0 -s 10.0.0.1 11:22:33:44:55:66 >root@host ~# arp -i eth1 -s 10.0.0.1 11:22:33:44:55:66 Then you're right :). It's doable on one network stack. I'm going to run some tests. Best regards, Marek