Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Herz <andi@geekosphere.org>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Bug in ipset with big timeouts
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:47:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120419124750.GA22975@sweethome.fritz.box> (raw)

I want to report the following bug:

If you create sets or add an element with a big timeout this can result
in a wrong timeout or even no entry. This occurs on 32 and 64 Bit and
the problem comes from the msecs_to_jiffies function. But first the
steps to reproduce the bug:

x86_64/amd64:
 
> ipset create test1 hash:net timeout 4294967
> ipset create test2 hash:net timeout 4294968
> ipset add test1 192.168.0.0/24
> ipset add test2 192.168.0.0/24
> ipset list

this will result in an empty test2 set and in an test1 set with the
entry and correct timeout.

Another example

> ipset create test hash:net timeout 1
> ipset add test 192.168.0.0/24 timeout 4294968
> ipset list

empty list, but

> ipset add test 192.168.0.0/24 timeout 42949680
> ipset list

results in

> 192.168.0.0/24 timeout 5

so an overflow.

x86/32-Bit:

> ipset create test hash:net timeout 1000
> ipset add test 192.168.0.0/24 timeout 2147484
> ipset list

results in:

> 192.168.0.0/24 timeout 1073741

it's working up to 2147483.

This is imho a bug as ipset says 

> ipset v6.11: Syntax error: '4294967296' is out of range 0-4294967295

so 4294967295 should be the maximum and it isn't.

I checked the source code and i think the following fix could help:

in kernel/include/linux/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_timeout.h the
ip_set_timeout_set needs to look like this:

> if ((timeout > (INT_MAX/1000)) || ((int)(timeout*1000) < 0)) timeout =
> (INT_MAX/1000);
> t = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout * 1000) + jiffies;

I added this if clause so "t" won't get bigger then 2147483 (32-Bit) or
4294967 (64-Bit). The problem is, that msecs_to_jiffies() returns
"MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET" in the case mentioned at 32-Bit, this explains the
1073741 value. And with the other values there is an overflow. My fix
may be wrong, so no guarantee, i'm still testing around and the overflow
isn't clear to me right now, i just figured out the problem with
"MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET".
Any help or recommendations welcome.

-- 
Andreas Herz

             reply	other threads:[~2012-04-19 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-19 12:47 Andreas Herz [this message]
2012-04-20 13:31 ` Bug in ipset with big timeouts Jozsef Kadlecsik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120419124750.GA22975@sweethome.fritz.box \
    --to=andi@geekosphere.org \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox