From: Andreas Herz <andi@geekosphere.org>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: IPv6 fragmentation next header missing in some cases in the skb
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:03:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150831120302.GU29140@kvmbude> (raw)
While playing around with the IPv6 extension headers i found a strange
behaviour when it comes to the IPv6 fragmentation header. First i used the
thc-ipv6 toolkit with that i could trigger the issue below in the first place.
I used the ipv6header match to check for those extension headers and
noticed that sometimes the match for "check if frag header set" didn't
match although i saw it in tcpdump/tshark and all the other checks for
ext headers worked.
I added a debug output after the "nexthdr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->nexthdr;" in
"net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_ipv6header.c" and saw that with special packets
the skb just returns the last nexthdr. So i'm quite confused why.
I generate packets with scapy and the easiest packet to reproduce it is
a simple ICMPv6 Echo Request packet with a fragmentation header.
##[ IPv6 ]###
version= 6L
tc= 0L
fl= 0L
plen= 16
nh= Fragment Header
hlim= 64
src= FOO
dst= BAR
###[ IPv6 Extension Header - Fragmentation header ]###
nh= ICMPv6
res1= 0L
offset= 0L
res2= 0L
m= 0L
id= 0
###[ ICMPv6 Echo Request ]###
type= Echo Request
code= 0
cksum= 0x848e
id= 0x0
seq= 0x0
data= ''
Which looks like this in tcpdump:
IP6 (hlim 64, next-header Fragment (44) payload length: 16) FOO > BAR frag
(0x00000000:0|8) ICMP6, echo request, seq 0
But if i printk the value of nexthdr it's just 58 for ICMPv6. The same packet
generate with dst,hopbyhop,routing header results in nexthdr value being
60,0,43 and then the 58.
So i can narrow it down to the frag header missing in the skb info at this point.
Does anyone have an idea why this happens and where i might need to look for
this issue?
Thanks.
--
Andreas Herz
next reply other threads:[~2015-08-31 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-31 12:03 Andreas Herz [this message]
2015-08-31 14:33 ` IPv6 fragmentation next header missing in some cases in the skb Andreas Herz
2015-09-01 11:11 ` Andreas Herz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150831120302.GU29140@kvmbude \
--to=andi@geekosphere.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox