Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: "Irwin L." <biatche@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nftables: drop ssh brute force with ip block
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:48:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160623104847.GA18850@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <576BBC72.8030507@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 06:39:46PM +0800, Irwin L. wrote:
> I currently use:
> tcp dport {22222,40022,42222} ct state new counter flow table bruteforce {
> ip saddr limit rate 3/minute } counter accept comment "limit bruteforce"
> 
> Is this ok?

Looks good to me. I would probably check for ct state new in first
place, given that this only matches the first packet a new TCP
connections. It will save you the tcp dport set lookup.

Note that you can even limit this per port, ie.

        ct state new tcp dport {22222,40022,42222} counter \
                flow table bruteforce { ip saddr . tcp dport limit rate 3/minute } \
                        counter accept comment "limit bruteforce"

using the 'ip saddr . tcp dport' concatenation. But I guess you want
globally ban anyone spamming you to those ports anyway.

> I wanted to ban spamming ips altogether, but I've since learned that this is
> the job of 'fail2ban'

fail2ban is nice to have to simplify this administrative hassle, but I
think it is still using iptables (it's been a while a I didn't look at
that code), we can do much better now with nft to resolve this problem.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-23 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-19 18:24 nftables: drop ssh brute force with ip block Irwin L.
2016-06-23 10:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-06-23 10:39   ` Irwin L.
2016-06-23 10:48     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2016-06-23 10:55       ` Irwin L.
2016-06-23 11:01         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160623104847.GA18850@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=biatche@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox