Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Martin Gignac <martin.gignac@gmail.com>,
	netfilter@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unable to create a chain called "trace"
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:16:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210217201618.GI2766@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210217195937.GA22016@orbyte.nwl.cc>

Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> wrote:
> > I don't see a solution, perhaps add dummy bison rule(s)
> > to explicitly signal closure of e.g. a rule context?
> 
> We can't influence start conditions from within bison (if that's what
> you had in mind).

Why not?  in scanner.l:

void scanner_pop_start_cond(void *scanner)
{
        yy_pop_state(scanner);
}

And then call it from bison as 'scanner_pop_start_cond(nft->scanner)'.

Needs %stack in scanner.l so yy_pop_state() is defined.

bison has more clue as to when a expression/rule/set block etc
has finished parsing than the scanner.

Not sure tracking { } nesting depth is enough with a pure scanner.l
approach.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-17 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-08 15:37 Unable to create a chain called "trace" Martin Gignac
2021-02-08 15:49 ` Florian Westphal
2021-02-08 16:47   ` Phil Sutter
2021-02-08 17:14     ` Florian Westphal
2021-02-09 13:56       ` Phil Sutter
2021-02-12  0:05         ` Florian Westphal
2021-02-12 11:40           ` Phil Sutter
2021-02-12 12:20             ` Florian Westphal
2021-02-12 17:09               ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-02-12 17:32                 ` Phil Sutter
2021-02-12 17:54                   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-02-12 21:07                     ` Phil Sutter
2021-02-12 18:02               ` Balazs Scheidler
2021-02-17 19:59               ` Phil Sutter
2021-02-17 20:16                 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2021-02-12 12:29     ` Florian Westphal
2021-02-12 12:48       ` Phil Sutter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210217201618.GI2766@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=martin.gignac@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox