netfilter.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [iptables] misleading print
@ 2011-12-05 15:26 U.Mutlu
  2011-12-05 15:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
  2011-12-05 15:44 ` Michal Kubeček
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: U.Mutlu @ 2011-12-05 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

I have in my script these statements:
   iptables -A INPUT  -i lo -j ACCEPT
   iptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT

When doing "iptables -L -n" then the above gets shown as this:
   ACCEPT     all  --  0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0

IMHO, this could easily be misinterpreted if one looks
only at the iptables output, because the crucial info,
ie. that it applies to the "lo" device only, is missing...

Right?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [iptables] misleading print
  2011-12-05 15:26 [iptables] misleading print U.Mutlu
@ 2011-12-05 15:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
  2011-12-05 15:44 ` Michal Kubeček
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2011-12-05 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: U.Mutlu; +Cc: netfilter

On Monday 2011-12-05 16:26, U.Mutlu wrote:

> I have in my script these statements:
>  iptables -A INPUT  -i lo -j ACCEPT
>  iptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT
>
> When doing "iptables -L -n" then the above gets shown as this:
>  ACCEPT     all  --  0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0
>
> IMHO, this could easily be misinterpreted if one looks
> only at the iptables output, because the crucial info,
> ie. that it applies to the "lo" device only, is missing...
>
> Right?

That's why one should use iptables -S or iptables-save.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [iptables] misleading print
  2011-12-05 15:26 [iptables] misleading print U.Mutlu
  2011-12-05 15:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
@ 2011-12-05 15:44 ` Michal Kubeček
  2012-08-09 22:00   ` Jan Engelhardt
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michal Kubeček @ 2011-12-05 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter; +Cc: U.Mutlu

On Monday 05 of December 2011 16:26EN, U.Mutlu wrote:
> I have in my script these statements:
>    iptables -A INPUT  -i lo -j ACCEPT
>    iptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT
> 
> When doing "iptables -L -n" then the above gets shown as this:
>    ACCEPT     all  --  0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0
> 
> IMHO, this could easily be misinterpreted if one looks
> only at the iptables output, because the crucial info,
> ie. that it applies to the "lo" device only, is missing...

Output of "iptables -L" doesn't show -i and -o matches by default. If 
you want to see them, use "-v" option.

                                                       Michal Kubeèek


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [iptables] misleading print
  2011-12-05 15:44 ` Michal Kubeček
@ 2012-08-09 22:00   ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2012-08-09 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michal Kubeček; +Cc: netfilter, U.Mutlu

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="windows-1252", Size: 827 bytes --]

On Monday 2011-12-05 16:44, Michal Kubeček wrote:

>On Monday 05 of December 2011 16:26EN, U.Mutlu wrote:
>> I have in my script these statements:
>>    iptables -A INPUT  -i lo -j ACCEPT
>>    iptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT
>> 
>> When doing "iptables -L -n" then the above gets shown as this:
>>    ACCEPT     all  --  0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0
>> 
>> IMHO, this could easily be misinterpreted if one looks
>> only at the iptables output, because the crucial info,
>> ie. that it applies to the "lo" device only, is missing...
>
>Output of "iptables -L" doesn't show -i and -o matches by default. If 
>you want to see them, use "-v" option.


Let's start a vote (of sorts) for getting rid of -L. Yes, it'll break 
people's oh-so-sacred scripts. But heck, you can't reasonably parse it 
anyway.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-09 22:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-05 15:26 [iptables] misleading print U.Mutlu
2011-12-05 15:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-12-05 15:44 ` Michal Kubeček
2012-08-09 22:00   ` Jan Engelhardt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).