From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chip Upsal Subject: RE: Using heartbeat for fall over on IPTables Firewall Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:44:32 -0700 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3019863CF306D211BA4500A0CC30812DC67938@exchange.cyberwolf.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: 'Steve Mickeler' , Antonio Paulo Salgado Forster Cc: Chip Upsal , netfilter@lists.netfilter.org in what ways is this better then heartbeat? -----Original Message----- From: Steve Mickeler [mailto:steve@warning.ca] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:39 PM To: Antonio Paulo Salgado Forster Cc: Chip Upsal; netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Subject: Re: Using heartbeat for fall over on IPTables Firewall I'll second the vote for keepalived. Its an amazing tool. http://www.keepalived.org/ On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Antonio Paulo Salgado Forster wrote: > > Suggestion: Try using keepalived instead. > > Regards, > > Forster > > > Chip Upsal @lists.netfilter.org on 03/17/2003 > 01:16:46 PM > > Sent by: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org > > > To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, "'linux-ha@muc.de'" > cc: > Subject: Using heartbeat for fall over on IPTables Firewall > > > > I am looking to use heartbeat to provide fall over for my iptables > firewall. > I am looking for those with experience using these tools together. > > I plan to use RH7.2 on the firewalls. > > I made some attempts at implementing such a solution but i ran into a few > problems. > > I would like suggestions on setup of the heartbeat configuration files. > Pointers on the iptables startup script. and advice on what kernel version > to use and if any patches need to be applied. > > Thanks in advance, > > Chip > > > > > Chip Upsal > SysAdmin > CyberWolf Inc > > > > >