From: George Alexandru Dragoi <waruiinu@gmail.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: again problem with alias / virtual interface
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:10:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3063e504071912106718d992@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3caf706513e42bc4d4a4a08209f5cd9@62.98.80.108>
Where are the RELATED,ESTABLISHED state packets ?
Also, define "does not work"
look here:
alex@server:~$ telnet 82.186.92.91 22
Trying 82.186.92.91...
Connected to 82.186.92.91.
Escape character is '^]'.
SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.5p1
same for .93
Are you sure the services you want to connect to bind on those ips, or 0.0.0.0 ?
Check this with netstat -tln |grep <desired port>
Best regards
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:55:00 +0200, Batstru <batstru@email.it> wrote:
> Hi all!
> I wrote days ago: I have a problem with virutal interface and iptables:
> my pc has 2 network interface, one with a private network address and the
> other one with
> public network addresses:
> eth0 --> 192.168.1.254 / 255.255.255.0
> eth1 --> 82.186.92.90 / 255.255.255.248
> eth1:1 --> 82.186.92.91 / 255.255.255.248
> eth1:2 --> 82.186.92.92 / 255.255.255.248
> eth1:3 --> 82.186.92.93 / 255.255.255.248
> eth1:4 --> 82.186.92.93 / 255.255.255.248
> I have configured network with ifconfig and route
> iptables has this filter rules:
> *filter
> :FORWARD DROP [0:0]
> :INPUT DROP [0:0]
> :OUTPUT DROP [0:0]
> -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -m state -i eth0 --state NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0 -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.90 --dport 22 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.90 --dport 80 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.90 --dport 143 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.90 --dport 10000
> --state NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.90 --dport 25 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.90 --dport 110 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.91 --dport 20 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.91 --dport 21 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.91 --dport 22 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1:1 -d 82.186.92.91 --dport 25 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.91 --dport 53 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.91 --dport 80 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.91 --dport 110 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.91 --dport 143 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.91 --dport 443 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.93 --dport 20 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.93 --dport 21 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.93 --dport 22 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.93 --dport 25 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.93 --dport 80 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.93 --dport 110 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.93 --dport 143 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1 -d 82.186.92.93 --dport 8888 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> as you can see I've tried changing configuration but anything changes: it is
> reported just a
> warning but the rule is not applied.
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state -i eth1:1 -d 82.186.92.91 --dport 25 --state
> NEW -j ACCEPT
> My pc is running Fedora core 2 and the kernel is 2.6.6 and I've just
> upgraded iptables to last
> release.
>
> The problem is that I can't access to services running at virtual
> interfaces.
> I tried to solve the problem as suggested me: I've seen that using alias is
> deprecated so I
> tried using iproute: I set up with
> ip addr add 82.186.92.90/24 brd 82.186.92.95 dev eth1 label eth1:0
> ip addr add 82.186.92.91/24 brd 82.186.92.95 dev eth1 label eth1:1
> ip addr add 82.186.92.92/24 brd 82.186.92.95 dev eth1 label eth1:2
> ip addr add 82.186.92.93/24 brd 82.186.92.95 dev eth1 label eth1:3
> ip addr add 82.186.92.94/24 brd 82.186.92.95 dev eth1 label eth1:4
> but after service iptables restart anything changes, alias's rules doesn't
> be applied and no
> errors is reported.
> I think I'm doing something wrong with iproute but I don't know what: shoud
> I give any command
> to enable iproute?
>
> My problem is quite strange, I've never seen such....
>
> tnks
> marco
> --
> Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
>
> Sponsor:
> Conto Arancio. Zero spese, stessa banca, più interessi.
> Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=657&d=20040719
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-19 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-19 18:55 again problem with alias / virtual interface Batstru
2004-07-19 19:10 ` George Alexandru Dragoi [this message]
2004-07-19 16:17 ` Marco Strullato
2004-07-19 19:14 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-19 19:35 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
2004-07-19 16:30 ` Marco Strullato
2004-07-20 19:09 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-20 19:12 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
2004-07-20 19:22 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
2004-07-21 15:34 ` Marco Colombo
2004-07-21 16:48 ` Michael Sconzo
2004-07-21 17:13 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
2004-07-22 2:27 ` Michael Sconzo
2004-07-22 16:58 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
2004-07-22 8:53 ` Marco Colombo
2004-07-22 16:05 ` Michael Sconzo
2004-07-19 19:46 ` Jamie Pratt
2004-07-19 19:58 ` Antony Stone
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-21 10:31 Batstru
2004-07-21 17:09 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3063e504071912106718d992@mail.gmail.com \
--to=waruiinu@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox