From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Alexandru Dragoi Subject: Re: Little question about imq device Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 20:12:02 +0300 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3063e504081510127d2e7da6@mail.gmail.com> References: <1413413188.20040815185935@op.pl> Reply-To: George Alexandru Dragoi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1413413188.20040815185935@op.pl> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Yea, if you have a bandwith and you want to balance it to both your server and the LAN you share the band to, and this is a main reason IMQ is needed for. On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 18:59:35 +0200, Marcin Sura wrote: > Witam > > I've found many examples where packets are redirected to IMQ device > in PREROUTING chain for ingress traffic shaping purposes. > > But is there any sense in redirecting packets to IMQ in FORWARD > chain also for ingress traffic shaping purposes? > > -- > Pozdrawiam > Marcin mailto:slacklist@op.pl > > -- Bla bla