From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Alexandru Dragoi Subject: Re: 2 NICs on same subnet Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 02:05:40 +0200 Message-ID: <3063e50411051605371fc202@mail.gmail.com> References: <7C9884991ADAE0479C14F10C858BCDF591E38F@alderaan.smgtec.com> <20041105191621.GA17889@zion.homelinux.com> <30df48470411051537e561da9@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: George Alexandru Dragoi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <30df48470411051537e561da9@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org I think the best solution is to use bonding, if the switch supports it (Yea, the switch MUST have this). This way you-ll have a single mac, and the balance for inbound will be made by the switch. I think everybody knows you can't control what is comming, but the sitch will be able to controll the outgoing. If the switch knows bonding, then a single ip should be enough.