From: Kramer <kramer@ufl.edu>
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: iptables, NAT and NetBIOS
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 08:48:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D00ABB8.2090408@ufl.edu> (raw)
iptables NAT still does not have a conntrack to handle the embedded
netbios addresses for a NATed subnet. Basically you cannot use iptables
NAT if there are MS networking hosts on any NATed subnet. Is anyone
working on this now?
I am very puzzled by this because I find very few networks that don't
have at least some MS Windows workstations. Even more puzzled since the
iptables.org group is also the Samba group for making unix/linux
interoperate with MS and iptables is not compatible with MS. Cisco,
Checkpoint and other commercial proprietary firewalls handle netbios
thru NAT.
If I have missed the fix to this problem somewhere I would love to be
corrected.
Jack Kramer
University of Florida
reply other threads:[~2002-06-07 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D00ABB8.2090408@ufl.edu \
--to=kramer@ufl.edu \
--cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox