From: Brian Capouch <brianc@palaver.net>
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Completely NAT an ISP: A practical possibility?
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 17:14:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D0BBC45.5000807@palaver.net> (raw)
I tried to capture the whole message there in the subject :-)
I wonder if the sages on this list might share advice as to whether or
not it might be practical to maintain a working ISP where ALL client
machines use private IP addresses, which are then NAT-ted to public IP
space as necessary by iptables.
I am getting ready to deploy a small ISP, and this is a very attractive
idea, but when soliciting ideas from various in-the-know folks I have
consulted opinions seem to vary very widely.
The biggest drawback that has been voiced so far is that many
peer-to-peer apps would break, but I'm not so sure right now that is bad
thing.
All advice gratefully considered.
Thanks.
B.
next reply other threads:[~2002-06-15 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-15 22:14 Brian Capouch [this message]
2002-06-15 22:33 ` Completely NAT an ISP: A practical possibility? Antony Stone
2002-06-15 22:54 ` Brian Capouch
2002-06-15 23:17 ` Nick Drage
2002-06-15 23:30 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-17 4:25 ` Sathi
2002-06-17 10:58 ` nat problem umar
2002-06-17 15:46 ` (no subject) skmail
2002-06-17 18:11 ` nat problem Antony Stone
2002-06-18 17:16 ` Completely NAT an ISP: A practical possibility? Rodrigo Senra
2002-06-18 18:50 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-18 20:22 ` Rodrigo Senra
2002-06-18 22:50 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-19 14:36 ` Rodrigo Senra
2002-06-19 15:20 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-20 9:48 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-20 19:37 ` Rodrigo Senra
2002-06-21 0:19 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-24 18:42 ` Rodrigo Senra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-15 23:47 hard__ware
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D0BBC45.5000807@palaver.net \
--to=brianc@palaver.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox