From: "Jesse W. Asher" <jasher1@tampabay.rr.com>
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Natted IRC "inherently insecure"?
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 07:42:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D243492.6090408@tampabay.rr.com> (raw)
Someone recently indicated to me that they believed that natting IRC
through a firewall was "inherently insecure" and I wanted to get
opinions on that statement. I guess, in my mind, it isn't any more or
less secure than any other service natted through the firewall - it all
depends on how comfortable you feel with the inherent security of the
client/tool that you're using.
Comments?
--
Jesse W. Asher jasher1@tampabay.rr.com
next reply other threads:[~2002-07-04 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-04 11:42 Jesse W. Asher [this message]
2002-07-08 0:19 ` Natted IRC "inherently insecure"? Stephen Frost
2002-07-08 0:38 ` Martin Josefsson
2002-07-08 23:26 ` Jesse W. Asher
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-04 22:10 George Vieira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D243492.6090408@tampabay.rr.com \
--to=jasher1@tampabay.rr.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox