From: Arindam Haldar <arindamhaldar@inbox.lv>
To: LARTC <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Cc: NETFILTER <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: owner based policy routing
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:34:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DA64DD6.7080805@inbox.lv> (raw)
hi all,
THE SCENARIO:
we are connected to 2 isp, both having their large network.. isp A has
gateway with ofc network while ispB has satellite gateway & hence there
are advantages to take specific routes thru specific isp.
PRESENT IMPLEMENTATION:
the present linux box with kernel-2.4.19, julains multiroute patch,
iproute-ss020116, htb3.6-020525 & iptables-1.2.7a... this box has 5
ether ports & presently doing only **source** based policy routing for
access to internet...at present no squid is implemented in this box...
things are working good for last 40-45 days !
THE RULES DEFINED:
10:
from all lookup main
50: from <ipNetispA> lookup ispA
50: from all fwmark 50 lookup ispA
75: from <ipNetispB> lookup ispB
75: from all fwmark 75 lookup GNFC
100: from <localNetA> lookup balance
100: from <localNetB> lookup balance
100: from <localNetC> lookup balance
100: from all fwmark 100 lookup balance
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
THE ROUTES:
[root@ICG surfNet]# ip route ls ta ispA
default via <gatewayISP-A> dev eth3 proto static src <eth3ISP-A>
prohibit default proto static metric 1
[root@ICG surfNet]# ip route ls ta ispB
default via <gatewayISP-B> dev eth0 proto static src <eth0ISP-B>
prohibit default proto static metric 1
[root@ICG surfNet]# ip route ls ta balance
default proto static
nexthop via <gatewayISP-A> dev eth3 weight 3
nexthop via <gatewayISP-B> dev eth0 weight 1
prohibit default proto static metric 1
[root@ICG surfNet]# ip route ls ta default
default via <gatewayISP-B> dev eth0
THE GOAL:
we want policy routing based on owner of the packet, in perticular we
want to handle squid to take the best path--best path according to
us(pls no BGP here).
WHAT WE TRIED:
we tried using iptables owner based rules & marked packets( as one can
see in rules above), but it didnt help.
iptables -I OUTPUT -t mangle -m owner --uid-owner <squid> -d 202.0.0.0/8
-j MARK --set-mark 50
iptables -I OUTPUT -t mangle -m owner --uid-owner <squid> -d 204.0.0.0/7
-j MARK --set-mark 50
iptables -I OUTPUT -t mangle -m owner --uid-owner <squid> -d 203.0.0.0/8
-j MARK --set-mark 75
iptables -I OUTPUT -t mangle -m owner --uid-owner <squid> -d 216.0.0.0/8
-j MARK --set-mark 75
but packets were not marked as seen by >> iptables -nvL -t mangle
& hence owner based pilicy routing not working
... hence now we turn to the list for help..
awaiting a reply ...
thanx to you all in advance...
A.H
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2002-10-11 4:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-11 4:04 Arindam Haldar [this message]
2002-10-12 0:59 ` owner based policy routing Julian Anastasov
2002-10-14 12:21 ` Arindam Haldar
2002-10-15 0:37 ` Julian Anastasov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DA64DD6.7080805@inbox.lv \
--to=arindamhaldar@inbox.lv \
--cc=lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox