From: "Svein E. Seldal" <Svein.Seldal@solidas.com>
To: Alistair Tonner <Alistair@alistairt.ath.cx>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: FTP/auth problems (slooow links)
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 22:36:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DA9D952.3030709@solidas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021013164821.GA689@Ajftl1.ajfthome.on.ca
Alistair Tonner wrote:
>
> I wonder ... are the boxes inside purely WIN boxes?
No. I've tested mostly all combinations of servers (win/linux), clients
(win/linux), client apps. (ftp/ie/leech/etc.), and the conclusion is
clear: Once the connection has gone through, then the data throughput is
what it is expected to be. Example: one large file takes the same amount
of time, regardless of it being transferred directly vs. through the
router. But many small files are considerable slower (up to 100 times
slower).
I have got reports that (external and internal) websites can take very
long time to come up, but once it has connected to the server, then the
data comes very quickly. I have got a gut feeling that this initial
connection opening delay is the same we are seeing on the FTP, only its
more evident on FTP. If I'm connecting to websites internally, the
complete page comes up very quickly. But if I try to connect to the same
page, via. the router, then the pictures takes very long time to complete.
So, I'm rephrasing the question: "What can be the reason that the router
is having such long initial delays on connections?"
> -- What sort of outside connection do you have?
2.3MBit SDSL. The data from my router is going into a DSL router from
cisco. I.e internet -- cisco dsl router -- linux router -- lan. However
for the testing on this example, the data goes from lan to linux router
to lan again, never via. the cisco router nor the dsl link. The linux
router is sole reason for the delay!
And I dont think this is a MTU issue here, as the router and the server
and the client is all sharing the same network switch. If a packet from
the client is received on the router addressed to the server, then it
will be received on eth0 and transmitted on eth0 again.
Thanks,
Svein E. Seldal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-13 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-13 13:08 FTP/auth problems (slooow links) Svein E. Seldal
2002-10-13 16:48 ` Alistair Tonner
2002-10-13 20:36 ` Svein E. Seldal [this message]
2002-10-14 9:52 ` Nuitari
2002-10-13 23:50 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-14 8:31 ` Connection opening problem (prev: FTP/auth problems (slooow links)) Svein E. Seldal
2002-10-15 21:21 ` Svein E. Seldal
2002-10-15 21:46 ` Antony Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DA9D952.3030709@solidas.com \
--to=svein.seldal@solidas.com \
--cc=Alistair@alistairt.ath.cx \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox