From: Andrey Tverdokhleb <at@tigry.net>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Is there way to bypass conntrack?
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:47:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F56291A.90003@tigry.net> (raw)
I'd really like to have some way to bypass ip_conntrack for some
packets. Basically I need to run very intensive port scanning through my
firewall and as soon as ip_conntrack loaded it dies within seconds from
syn flood. Increase limit doesnt work becuase I need about 127000
packets to be sent from different source ports. So far I just keep
contrack unloaded and firewall works fine as pure stateless filter. But
now I need statefull inspection on this machine for some IPs. So the
question - is it possible to avoid connection tracking for some specific
IPs?
Thanks!
Andrey
next reply other threads:[~2003-09-03 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-03 17:47 Andrey Tverdokhleb [this message]
2003-09-04 17:52 ` Is there way to bypass conntrack? Julian Gomez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F56291A.90003@tigry.net \
--to=at@tigry.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox