From: Wim Ceulemans <wim.ceulemans@able.be>
To: Jamie Vuyk <jvuyk@jacobson.co.uk>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: GRE/PPTP Pass-through problems
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 14:14:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F572CC1.4010907@able.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8EC0756327A4994298EFD721CFC7355B01B14C@jfm2.jacobson.co.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2871 bytes --]
Hi
I had the same problems with GRE not passing through to a server behind
the firewall.
I then used kernel 2.4.22 and the latest pom snapshot
(patch-o-matic-20030831) with iptables 1.2.8
and gre passed through.
However, after testing I notice now that although PPTP connections to a
win2000 server behind the
firewall work, that the connection is not reliable. After 3 to 4 minutes
the connection is closed for
some unknown reason and people have to re-establish the connection.
Anyone experiencing this problem also?
Regards
Wim
Jamie Vuyk wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I hope this will be a simple post that can lay to rest what a lot of
>people appear to be having trouble with. I have read a massive amount
>of posts all over the web and there seems to be much confusion in this
>simple matter.
>
>
>
>Basically there are two aspects to my problems:
>
>1) Does the standard kernel (RH 2.4.18) need to be patched in any
>way in order to PASS THROUGH proto 47 (GRE) to an internal server? Im
>running a simply iptables firewall which I want to pass an external PPTP
>VPN connection through to an internal server. It is most important to
>note that the firewall is masquerading all connections which I think is
>where the confusion lies. As I understand if I want Linux to terminate
>the PPTP VPN I need a patch, if I want it to pass through I don't.
>However I am having a lot of trouble getting this to work and I would
>like to know if Im on the right track.
>
>
>
>2) Given that I don't have to patch anything and it all should "just
>work"... I have setup my firewall to allow and forward the 1723 to my
>internal server. This appears to work but the external Win2k box gets
>stuck on "verifying username and password". This eventually times out
>with "disconnected". A simple test was to Telnet to port 1723.
>Although there is no response as such from the server (expected) it does
>connect with a blank screen both internally and externally suggesting
>the forwarding is working ok. At what point does the 1723 data exchange
>end and the "payload" as such start on the GRE protocol? Is GRE
>involved in the 'verifying username and password' stage or is that still
>TCP on 1723? Just so you are aware I have the rest of the firewall
>fully operational with various port forwards etc that work fine. It is
>essentially only the VPN's that are giving me grief.
>
>
>
>If you could get some basic info I maybe able to troubleshoot this and
>get it operational.
>
>Cheers in advance for you help.
>
>J
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Wim Ceulemans
R&D Engineer
Secure Internet Communication with aXs Guard
Able NV
Leuvensesteenweg 282 - B-3190 Boortmeerbeek - Belgium
Phone: + 32 15 50.44.00 - Fax: + 32 15 50.44.09
E-mail: wim.ceulemans@able.be
--
Security check on this e-mail has been done by aXs GUARD
(http://www.axsguard.com)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-04 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-01 12:02 GRE/PPTP Jamie Vuyk
2003-09-04 12:14 ` Wim Ceulemans [this message]
2003-09-04 16:04 ` GRE/PPTP Pass-through problems Wim Ceulemans
2003-09-12 2:04 ` GRE/PPTP Philip Craig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-04 13:57 GRE/PPTP Pass-through problems jimbo jones
2003-09-04 16:27 Jorge Armando Medina
2003-09-04 18:27 ` Wim Werk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F572CC1.4010907@able.be \
--to=wim.ceulemans@able.be \
--cc=jvuyk@jacobson.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox