From: Oumer Teyeb <oumer@kom.auc.dk>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: memory cleanup after setverdict
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:24:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F8A996A.6020707@kom.auc.dk> (raw)
Hi,
I thought once the set verdict is called, the ipq_packet_msg_t param
that was holding the packet will be freed by libipq. but I can access it
after the setverdict is called, and also the data I have copied. For
example, in a code like this
ipq_packet_msg_t *m = ipq_get_packet(buf);
ipq_set_verdict(handler, m->packet_id, NF_ACCEPT, 0, NULL);
fwrite ((usnigned int *) (m+1), 1, m->data_len, file);
I expected the third call to fail, but it doesn't. Then when is the
memory used by the ipq_packet_msg_t parameter freed? Or am I responsible
for freeing it myself?
Regards,
Oumer
reply other threads:[~2003-10-13 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F8A996A.6020707@kom.auc.dk \
--to=oumer@kom.auc.dk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox