From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Renzmann Subject: Re: "selective" connection tracking? Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:17:38 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3FA252E2.4010304@otaku42.de> References: <3F9EA786.5060401@otaku42.de> <1067591422.812.13.camel@elendil.intranet.cartel-securite.net> <3FA23DB7.3010300@otaku42.de> <1067598149.4557.7.camel@elendil.intranet.cartel-securite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1067598149.4557.7.camel@elendil.intranet.cartel-securite.net> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Cedric Blancher Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hi. Cedric Blancher wrote: >>Just to be sure: it will still be possible to use conntrack for traffic >>that it targeted to the router itself, while pushing forwarded traffic >>through the router without connection traffic. Correct? > You're able to do anything you want, as you have to explicitly implement > which traffic you do not want to track. Suppose your local IP is > A.B.C.D, then doing something like this should do the trick : > > iptables -t raw -A PREROUTING -d ! A.B.C.D -j NOTRACK > > Do this to exclude all traffic destined to local box. You mean "not destined to the local box", right? :) Bye, Mike