From: Jeffrey Laramie <JALaramie@Loudoun-Fairfax.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: iptables questions
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:07:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FB8D61F.7050005@Loudoun-Fairfax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003601c3ab66$7396c360$2178df50@lanzor2k.com>
Antti Korpela wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have here some questions and i hope you have some time to answer
>
> 1. What difference and which is better between: iptables -t nat -j
> MASQUERADE or SNAT --to IP if im using it for internet gateway
> NAT-machine in big LAN-parties, over 300 IP:s.
According to Oskar's tutorial SNAT is preferable for static IPs:
> It is still possible to use the *MASQUERADE* target instead of *SNAT*
> even though you do have an static IP, however, it is not favorable
> since it will add extra overhead, and there may be inconsistencies in
> the future which will thwart your existing scripts and render them
> "unusable".
>
> 2. I have get this error often "too much work on eth0, dropping
> packet..." what this mean? do i have to put this on kernel:
> echo "65000" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max ? is there any
> other solutions for this ?
Can't help with this.
> 3. Do you have some other tips for MASQ ? :)
SNAT is pretty straightforward and there aren't a lot of configuration
choices. It's a good idea to read all of Oskar's tutorial, but you
should at least read and understand this section:
http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/chunkyhtml/targets.html#SNATTARGET
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-17 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-15 10:51 iptables questions Antti Korpela
2003-11-17 14:07 ` Jeffrey Laramie [this message]
2003-11-17 14:18 ` Antony Stone
2003-11-19 15:32 ` Cedric Blancher
2003-11-18 1:12 ` William Stearns
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-26 23:33 james li
2002-11-27 0:08 ` Joel Newkirk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FB8D61F.7050005@Loudoun-Fairfax.com \
--to=jalaramie@loudoun-fairfax.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox