Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Hall <halls@aros.net>
To: Chris Brenton <cbrenton@chrisbrenton.org>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: icmp: 10.1.4.50 unreachable - need to frag (mtu 500) [tos 0xc0]
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:12:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <400418DB.209@aros.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1074009062.5742.222.camel@grendel>

Thank for the response Chris,

The problem that I see with that solution is that most of the sites, 
which are many by this point, that I have had problems with aren't under 
my control.  Including aol.com, I can just see me trying to convince AOL 
to reconfigure their servers to not set the DF :).  Are there anyother 
work arounds that you can propose? 

thnx,
  --scott

Chris Brenton wrote:

>On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 03:02, Scott Hall wrote:
>  
>
>>So the one question that this whole issue raises in my mind is, Isn't 
>>there anyway to handle the (DF) packets differently?
>>    
>>
>
>Absolutely. Config the stacks on both ends of the connection to _not_
>set DF. This will cause the router at the MTU border to frag the packets
>and will not require an ICMP error packet.
>
>  
>
>>I ask 
>>becuase we have two cisco routers and 6 Adtran routers that handle this 
>>same scenario quietly. 
>>    
>>
>
>I'm guessing if you check the decodes from those packets you will see
>the public rather than the private IP embedded in the payload. I think
>this is what is killing you. This is an old Netfilter bug that I
>*thought* was fixed ages ago.
>
>HTH,
>C
>
>
>
>  
>



  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-13 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-06  7:07 icmp: 10.1.4.50 unreachable - need to frag (mtu 500) [tos 0xc0] Scott Hall
2004-01-06 11:23 ` Chris Brenton
2004-01-06 15:48   ` Scott Hall
2004-01-13  8:02   ` Scott Hall
2004-01-13 15:51     ` Chris Brenton
2004-01-13 16:12       ` Scott Hall [this message]
2004-01-13 16:38         ` Chris Brenton
2004-01-13 17:52           ` Scott Hall
2004-01-14 18:11           ` Mark Weaver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=400418DB.209@aros.net \
    --to=halls@aros.net \
    --cc=cbrenton@chrisbrenton.org \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox