From: Scott Hall <halls@aros.net>
To: Chris Brenton <cbrenton@chrisbrenton.org>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: icmp: 10.1.4.50 unreachable - need to frag (mtu 500) [tos 0xc0]
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:12:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <400418DB.209@aros.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1074009062.5742.222.camel@grendel>
Thank for the response Chris,
The problem that I see with that solution is that most of the sites,
which are many by this point, that I have had problems with aren't under
my control. Including aol.com, I can just see me trying to convince AOL
to reconfigure their servers to not set the DF :). Are there anyother
work arounds that you can propose?
thnx,
--scott
Chris Brenton wrote:
>On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 03:02, Scott Hall wrote:
>
>
>>So the one question that this whole issue raises in my mind is, Isn't
>>there anyway to handle the (DF) packets differently?
>>
>>
>
>Absolutely. Config the stacks on both ends of the connection to _not_
>set DF. This will cause the router at the MTU border to frag the packets
>and will not require an ICMP error packet.
>
>
>
>>I ask
>>becuase we have two cisco routers and 6 Adtran routers that handle this
>>same scenario quietly.
>>
>>
>
>I'm guessing if you check the decodes from those packets you will see
>the public rather than the private IP embedded in the payload. I think
>this is what is killing you. This is an old Netfilter bug that I
>*thought* was fixed ages ago.
>
>HTH,
>C
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-13 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-06 7:07 icmp: 10.1.4.50 unreachable - need to frag (mtu 500) [tos 0xc0] Scott Hall
2004-01-06 11:23 ` Chris Brenton
2004-01-06 15:48 ` Scott Hall
2004-01-13 8:02 ` Scott Hall
2004-01-13 15:51 ` Chris Brenton
2004-01-13 16:12 ` Scott Hall [this message]
2004-01-13 16:38 ` Chris Brenton
2004-01-13 17:52 ` Scott Hall
2004-01-14 18:11 ` Mark Weaver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=400418DB.209@aros.net \
--to=halls@aros.net \
--cc=cbrenton@chrisbrenton.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox