From: Minh Cao <minhcao123@yahoo.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>,
Ukeme Noah <ukeme.noah@gmail.com>
Cc: 'Minh Cao' <minhcao123@yahoo.com>, netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Iptables Rules
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:01:00 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <401296.6393.qm@web82604.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0804091153100.4411@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Thanks for your help !
Please explain why these two acting differently.
On #2 I can login as anonymous, but ls.
Can I combine two rules into one ?
1/
-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j
ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -p tcp -m tcp --dport 21
-j ACCEPT
2/
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED -p
tcp -m tcp --dport 21 -j ACCEPT
--- Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday 2008-04-09 00:01, Minh Cao wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>Is that matter if I placed the options/extensions
> ( -m
> >>and -p ) in different orders ?
> >
> >No, but it matters between multiple -m.
>
> On Wednesday 2008-04-09 11:23, Ukeme Noah wrote:
> >Howdy,
> >The last two, the ones using the state machine
> might give you problems if
> >you use only those without specifying to allow
> established ssh connections.
> >
> >So, I'd suggest you add ,ESTABLISHED right after
> NEW to make the line
>
> Adding random states to rules of which you do not
> have the context
> is unlikely to be fruitful.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> "unsubscribe netfilter" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-09 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <47fc8b35.0e1f400a.4de1.0570@mx.google.com>
2008-04-09 9:53 ` Iptables Rules Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 17:01 ` Minh Cao [this message]
2008-04-09 17:03 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-08 22:01 Minh Cao
2008-04-09 4:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-22 18:57 Iptables rules Shams Fantar
2007-09-22 19:32 ` Eljas Alakulppi
2007-09-22 19:44 ` Mike Wright
2005-08-04 19:36 multiports Peggy Kam
2005-08-05 6:34 ` multiports Jan Engelhardt
2005-08-10 20:13 ` Maximum number of ports? Peggy Kam
2005-09-13 22:10 ` Maximum number of rules in iptables? Peggy Kam
2005-09-15 15:22 ` iptables rules Peggy Kam
2005-09-15 15:26 ` Jörg Harmuth
2005-09-15 15:37 ` Peggy Kam
2005-09-15 16:23 ` Jörg Harmuth
2005-10-21 13:46 ` Realos
2005-10-21 16:03 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-10-21 16:19 ` Jörg Harmuth
2005-09-15 15:33 ` Jörg Harmuth
2002-09-09 4:06 Iptables rules Didier Hung Wan Luk
2002-09-07 11:59 ashivale
2002-09-07 9:39 Didier Hung Wan Luk
2002-09-07 10:36 ` Antony Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=401296.6393.qm@web82604.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=minhcao123@yahoo.com \
--cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ukeme.noah@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox