From: RRuegner <robert@ruegner.org>
To: Andrew Schulman <andrex@alumni.utexas.net>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: newbie struggling with p-o-m in kernel 2.6
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:39:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4052C8C3.9080207@ruegner.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MPG.1abbd219144e52d99896a5@localhost>
Andrew Schulman schrieb:
> Hello. I'm a newbie to patch-o-matic, though comfortable with patching
> and building my own kernels.
>
> I'm running kernel 2.6.3, and I'd like to install the 'condition' and
> 'time' extensions to netfilter. But I'm having a really hard time of
> it. Here's as well as I can figure it right now:
>
> - patch-o-matic, it seems, doesn't work at all with kernel 2.6. I can't
> find any statement about this on netfilter.org, but someone in a
> newsgroup said it was so, and when I try to apply patches with p-o-m it
> fails with complaints about not finding Config.help etc. Shouldn't this
> be a FAQ?
>
> - I grabbed patch-o-matic-ng-20040302, and tried it. But it won't apply
> the condition and time patches, because both of them are marked 'linux
> < 2.6.0'.
>
> So as far as I can tell, right now someone who wants to use the
> condition and time extensions with kernel 2.6 is just out of luck. Am I
> right, or is there some other technique that I'm missing? Do we have an
> ETA for 2.6-compliant condition and time patches?
>
> Also, a couple of minor complaints from a newbie:
>
> - It seems that all of the old patch suite structure is gone, but the
> docs haven't caught up yet. The Netfilter Extensions HOWTO is very
> nice, but unfortunately it's no longer accurate. The newbie is left to
> discover this for himself and guess that where before he would run e.g.
> './runme extra/condition', the new command is './runme condition'.
>
> - Even though I try to run runme in batch mode, it always asks where my
> iptables source code is. Looking through the script, there doesn't seem
> to be an environment variable to set for that.
>
> I realize that p-o-m-ng is a work in progress. Please consider these to
> be constructive suggestions for improvement.
>
> Longer term, what is the plan for getting all of these useful extensions
> merged into the main kernel line?
>
> Thanks for your help.
> Andrew.
>
Hi Andrew,
youre right pom-ng is currently under Testing mode
watch out the list for statements from the coders
Regards
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-13 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-12 18:57 newbie struggling with p-o-m in kernel 2.6 Andrew Schulman
2004-03-13 8:39 ` RRuegner [this message]
2004-03-14 11:32 ` Andrew Schulman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4052C8C3.9080207@ruegner.org \
--to=robert@ruegner.org \
--cc=andrex@alumni.utexas.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox