From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sasa Stupar <sasa@stupar.homelinux.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent proxy question
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:07:57 +0100
Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <40558E8D.2010303@stupar.homelinux.net>
References: <40556EE6.6040809@stupar.homelinux.net> <200403151036.00538.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> <405589BC.70703@stupar.homelinux.net> <200403151057.13169.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <200403151057.13169.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Netfilter-List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>

Antony Stone pravi:

> On Monday 15 March 2004 10:47 am, Sasa Stupar wrote:
> 
> 
>>Antony Stone pravi:
>>
>>
>>>>$IPT -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $INIF -s $INNET -d 192.168.10.10 -j SNAT
>>>>--to 192.168.10.111
>>>>
>>>>Is there something to add or change here?
>>>
>>>Yes.   Remove the POSTROUTING rule, because it is specifically changing
>>>the source address of all packets sent to the proxy server to be that of
>>>the firewall.
>>
>>Not good. Now my transparent proxy doesn't work anymore. :(
>>What's the catch?
> 
> 
> 1. Now that it isn't working, do you get any errors in your proxy log file, or 
> does it think there are no requests?
> 2. What source IPs does your proxy server allow access for?
> 3. Does the proxy server know how to route back to the clients?
> 4. Do you have a suitable ESTABLISHED,RELATED rule on your firewall to allow 
> back the replies?   (I expect so, but you didn't post your full ruleset 
> earlier, so I can't be sure...)
> 5. Where are the clients on the network in relation to the firewall and the 
> proxy server (please don't tell me they're on the same subnet as the 
> proxy...?)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Antony.
> 

1. I've got nothing in the squid log but in the browser I get Timeout 
error, so looks like squid doesn't get any requests
2. It allows for LAN IP's
3. Yep
4. Yep $IPT -A STATE -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
5. Some of them are on the same subnet and some not.

Regards,
Sasa