From: Gianni Pucciani <gp.puccio@tin.it>
To: Netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: vpn under linux
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:31:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4077BEFF.4060902@tin.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200404101018.38664.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
Antony Stone wrote:
>On Saturday 10 April 2004 10:01 am, Gianni Pucciani wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi all,
>>some of you can give me some input about the best way to set up a vpn
>>under two Linux RH9 systems?
>>I heared there are different solution (PPP and SSH, PPTP...) and I'd
>>like to know your opinion about that.
>>
>>
>
>PPP is Point-to-Point Protocol, and has almost nothing to do with VPNs :)
>
>SSH is Secure Shell, and at least it contains some encryption, but again, is
>almost nothing to do with VPNs (but more on that later).
>
>
I thought that they could be used in conjuction to achieve vpn
functionalities...
>PPTP is Pretty Poor Tunneling Protocol (oh, no, sorry, it's a Point to Point
>Tunneling Protocol...), and is the way Microsoft systems do VPN.
>
>The "standard" way to do VPN (in other words, the method which is supported by
>most vendors, uses open standards, and also has the best security) is IPsec.
>
>The usual way to do IPsec under Linux is to use FreeS/WAN under kernel 2.4, or
>the built-in IPsec under kernel 2.6.
>
>I use FreeS/WAN, I like it, it works well with netfilter (once you've got used
>to the path the packets take at each end), and I'm happy with its 3DES/RSA
>security.
>
>
Ok, I'll investigate this solution :-), thanks.
>I said I'd mention more about SSH - that also uses good encryption and is
>therefore secure, and once you have an SSH connection between two machines,
>you can "tunnel" almost any network traffic you like between them, and it
>does work, although I wouldn't select this as a first choice for a VPN
>because there's a lot more manual setting up involved. IPsec is more like a
>network route - you just configure it, and let the two endpoint machines get
>on with negotiating the link, and then computers from whichever network
>ranges you've configured the VPN to support can connect to each other
>transparently through a nice secure tunnel across the Internet.
>
>Hope this helps,
>
>
Sure it helps :-)
Thank you very much!
Gianni
>Regards,
>
>Antony.
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-10 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-10 9:01 vpn under linux Gianni Pucciani
2004-04-10 9:18 ` Antony Stone
2004-04-10 9:31 ` Gianni Pucciani [this message]
2004-04-10 9:44 ` Antony Stone
2004-04-10 9:41 ` Gianni Pucciani
2004-04-10 10:00 ` Antony Stone
2004-04-10 10:15 ` Gianni Pucciani
2004-04-10 23:41 ` Alexander Samad
2004-04-11 0:09 ` Aaron P. Martinez
2004-04-12 12:25 ` Scott MacKay
2004-04-12 16:01 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-04-12 18:58 ` Dick St.Peters
2004-04-10 9:47 ` Victor Julien
2004-04-10 12:30 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-04-10 17:23 ` Tony Earnshaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4077BEFF.4060902@tin.it \
--to=gp.puccio@tin.it \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox