From: Bernd Strebel <b.strebel@digitec.de>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: strange behavior of connlimit matching rules
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 09:00:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40A9B4A4.2000201@digitec.de> (raw)
Along with the implementation of a simple rule set ( ACCEPT connections
if ! --connlimit-above nan LOG connections if --connlimit-above n) we
experienced a strange behavior of the connlimit matching module:
Rule #m: ...-m connlimit --connlimit-above n -j LOG
Rule #m+1: ...-m connlimit ! --connlimit-above n -j ACCEPT
works fine, while
Rule #m: ...-m connlimit ! --connlimit-above n -j ACCEPT
Rule #m+1: ...-m connlimit --connlimit-above n -j LOG
works not (no match on rule #m+1).
Many thanks for any explanation.
Bernd
environment: kernel 2.4.26, iptables 1.2.9, pomng-20040302
============
iptables output (source/dest. stripped, always 0.0.0.0/0)
===============
Chain OUTPUT (policy DROP 9 packets, 560 bytes): OK
num pkts bytes target prot opt in out
1 131 9331 ACCEPT all -- * lo
2 116 11140 ACCEPT all -- * *
state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
3 5 260 LOG tcp -- * eth0
mport dports 22 #conn/32 > 2 state NEW
LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix CONNLIMIT
4 5 260 ACCEPT tcp -- * eth0
mport dports 22 #conn/32 < 2 state NEW
5 9 560 LOG all -- * *
LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix DROP-AT-END-OF-CHAIN
Chain OUTPUT (policy DROP 10 packets, 612 bytes): CONNLIMIT not logged!
num pkts bytes target prot opt in out
1 138 9950 ACCEPT all -- * lo
2 124 11648 ACCEPT all -- * *
state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
3 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * eth0
mport dports 22 #conn/32 < 2 state NEW
4 0 0 LOG tcp -- * eth0
mport dports 22 #conn/32 > 2 state NEW
LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix CONNLIMIT
5 10 612 LOG all -- * *
LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix DROP-AT-END-OF-CHAIN
next reply other threads:[~2004-05-18 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-18 7:00 Bernd Strebel [this message]
[not found] ` <20040518074343.GA5990@nic.fr>
2004-05-19 10:18 ` strange behavior of connlimit matching rules Bernd Strebel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40A9B4A4.2000201@digitec.de \
--to=b.strebel@digitec.de \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox