From: Feizhou <feizhou@linuxmail.org>
To: Timothy Webster <timothyw@outblaze.com>
Cc: Michael Gale <michael.gale@utilitran.com>, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: over a 1,000,000,000 individual ips to block
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:43:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40E155E2.5010306@linuxmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040629110452.30056.qmail@team.outblaze.com>
>
> Limited maximum connections and a simple accept established
> help, but we need more. Currently looking into modify
> the set patch to handle this large number.
> If not iptables then openbsd pf.
that's why you are looking into ipset....i asked a similar question a
while ago...need to check to see if there is a 2.6.x version out now.
>
> We do get up to 100 smtp connections from a simple ip during peak times.
>
>
>> If you allow a simple IP to make a 100 smtp connections to your
>
> mail server
>
>
>>then you have other problems. Why you would allow any IP to make more
>
> then 10-15
>
>>connections is beyond me. Also .. if you set a error limit (example
>
> mine is 5)
>
>>when that limit is reached the smtp and tcp connection are dropped.
postfix does not have per ip connection limiting and this goes for
sendmail (if you've got a ruleset for that please post) and for
tcpserver (qmail-smtpd)
>
>
>
>>I am not saying that you should not block abusive IP's or network's at
>
> the
>
>
>>
>>Also what about ESTABLISHED connections ??? If you do not use a
>
> ESTABLISHED
>
>>state -j ACCEPT at the top ... then each IP would then in theory have
>
> to match 1
>
>>million rules every time it came in.
>>
>>I am sure there is a better answer then to create 1 million iptable
>
> rules.
>
Which is why Timothy is asking about ipset/ippool functionality.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-29 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-29 11:04 over a 1,000,000,000 individual ips to block Timothy Webster
2004-06-29 11:43 ` Feizhou [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-24 14:57 Timothy Webster
2004-06-28 12:45 ` Michael Gale
2004-06-28 13:04 ` Alex Sirbu
2004-06-28 13:36 ` Feizhou
2004-06-28 13:52 ` Alex Sirbu
2004-06-28 14:14 ` Feizhou
2004-06-28 13:20 ` Feizhou
2004-06-28 16:31 ` Michael Gale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40E155E2.5010306@linuxmail.org \
--to=feizhou@linuxmail.org \
--cc=michael.gale@utilitran.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=timothyw@outblaze.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox